5 Silly Simple Mistakes Leaders Make When Setting Team Goals

July 18, 2023

If you’re like most, you have moments where you get frustrated when team performance misses the mark.


It’s never been more critical for your team to stretch and win. In this season, it’s also never been more challenging.


Many teams feel disoriented, which makes missing targets or objectives even more likely. How do you even know what to shoot for in a swirling environment as confusing as ours?


All of these are great questions, and fortunately, there are answers.


After leading teams for three decades, here are five mistakes I’ve made and want you to avoid when setting goals with your team.

field goal post

The solution for many of these issues is a framework I call “Results-Based Leadership,” which I outline in-depth inside the Lead Team Institute {LTI}


5 Silly Simple Mistakes Leaders Make When Setting Team Goals 


1. No clearly owned mission, vision, and set of values.


Your mission, vision, and values decide how and in what direction your team runs (with or without you). Most organizations know enough to throw a mission statement and set of values on the wall, but it usually doesn’t make it into the hearts of the team. 


What’s on the wall often isn’t owned down the hall.


It’s the same with cultural values. Many leaders love envisioning the culture they want, but often there’s a big gap between the culture they want and the culture they have. In addition (and from testing this out), most staff members couldn’t name more than one cultural value their organization has embraced.


So, how can you tell if your team owns your mission, vision, and cultural values?


Here’s a little test: During your next Lead Team meeting, ask your team if they can sketch out your campus values, mission, and vision without looking them up.


If they can’t, you know there’s work to do in the front office before your DNA can scale throughout the rest of the system. When mission, vision, and values aren’t owned by your Lead Team, your other teams will move in a thousand different directions and might not progress much of anything.


If you would like to experience the simple 3-step process I use to create better cultural value statements, you will want to consider the
Executive Team Quarterly {EQ}


Defining your values is the first step to having your team own them.



FREE RESOURCE: Transform Your 1:1s


Sign up for my FREE Leadership Download for better practice leading team 1:1 meetings.  


Get Instant Access HERE

2. No clear strategy.


Mission, vision, and values should have a long shelf life.


Strategy, not so much. And that’s critical because your strategy is how you plan to accomplish your mission.


Here’s an example that’s probably fresh on everybody’s mind: For almost every campus system, COVID threw a wrench (or nuclear bomb) into strategy. And a return to your old strategy likely didn’t work.


As much as you didn’t have certainty during that season, it was vital to have clarity.


Part of my strategy before the pandemic was speaking and training exclusively on campuses. When COVID shut down travel, my team and I pivoted (overnight) to become a 100% digital Executive Team Coaching practice. 

  • Faith communities moved online. 
  • Schools and campuses delivered virtual instruction.
  • Restaurants moved to takeout and outside patios.


The mission of serving your people stays the same but the strategy changes.


In fact, in times of rapid change, quick pivots in strategy preserve the mission.


If you haven’t clarified your strategy recently (even if it’s a strategy for the next 30 days), block a 2-hour session with your Lead Team and do it. Soon!


No team can own and commit to what it doesn’t understand.

 

3. No clear goal.


Once you decide 
how to accomplish your mission, you must determine how much. 


Many leaders naturally answer that question by telling their teams that they want ‘more’—more enrollment, grants, community partnerships, retention, and graduates.


Having
 more as a goal demotivates your team because you’ll never hit it.


You can’t hit more.


Eventually, your team feels like the kid who brings home a straight-B report card, only to have the parent say, “Why not A’s?” And returning the next semester with As and hears, “Do they give A+’s?”


Who doesn’t want to say, “I quit” in that environment?


So, define it. What does
more look like?


One person? 100 people? 2% growth? 20 growth%? 200 growth%?


Then when you hit it, celebrate it.


4. No focus on lead measures.


Leaders are easily lured into focusing on measures they cannot control. These are the system’s lag measures (i.e., graduation rates, enrollment numbers, and expenses).

  • Get the numbers.
  • Say they’re not quite good enough.
  • Tell their team(s) to do better.


While these measures are great for telling you how your organization has done or is doing, the challenge is that you can’t change them. Your lag measures represent your historical data that cannot be changed.


A better option is to look at 
lead measures. Lead measures are elements within your control that ultimately impact the performance of your lag measures. 


Lead measures might include focusing on response times to inquiries from prospective students, the number of formally guided campus visits each week, or program partnerships secured each semester. 


Your team will never crush its goals if it focuses on what it can’t change. Instead, Higher Performance Teams a savvy to understand the dynamics between their preferred lag measures and the most impactful lead measures that influence their growth. 

 

5. No one is accountable.


Of all of the strategies on this post, this is the one that’s the hardest for most leaders but also gives the most significant return. I know because I’ve been on both sides of the challenge—not wanting to hold people accountable (and doing it poorly) and then learning how to do it well.


When a team member misses an expected goal, leaders tend to utter two phrases that create a complete lack of accountability.

  1. “That’s okay.”
  2. __________ (nothing at all).


Mature leaders know it’s NOT ok that a team member missed the goal or deadline. Stop acting like it
is ok. 


Not saying anything when someone missed an expected goal is a pretty good tell that the leader:

  • Didn’t know.
  • Didn’t care.
  • Were too afraid.


Both responses are toxic to team health.


Ironically, holding your people accountable (I prefer the term ownership) in a healthy way motivates them rather than demotivates them. Guess what else?


Your best leaders love being a part of teams where every member owns their work. 

  • On-time.
  • On budget.
  • As expected.


Leaders who fail to hold team members accountable will end up with B and C-Team players because your A-Team players are leaving out the back door.


Transform Your Future | Lead With Clarity | Grow Your Performance


You aren't alone if you've struggled to find clarity in leading your team forward.


Teams function at less than 60% of their performance potential and community trust is at an all-time low. 


Simply put, leading people and systems has never been more complex.


The Lead Team Institute {LTI} will equip you to break through your growth barriers.


Whether it's leading results-based teams, communicating with success, improving your engagement, increasing influence, refreshing your vision, building trusting communities, or many other challenges we face as campus leaders, you'll know exactly what steps to take to generate momentum for your community.


If you want to build an irresistible campus brand, you will want to join the waiting list to enroll in the next Lead Team Institute {LTI} Campus Cohort. 


Accelerate Your Team’s:


  • Communication
  • Connection
  • Alignment
  • Capacity
  • Execution
  • Culture


Reserve Your Spot for Fall 2023. Join the Lead Team Institute Waitlist Today!

More Blog Articles

By HPG Info February 19, 2025
What fruit flies and frustrated executives have in common Picture this: A minor workplace irritant shows up in your inbox at 8:47 AM. By lunch, it's festered into a full-blown emotional abscess. Sound familiar? You're not alone - and the science behind this emotional contagion is more fascinating than you'd think. Recent research in organizational psychology reveals that leader annoyance acts like an emotional pathogen, spreading through teams with surprising speed and potency. A groundbreaking study by Barsade and O'Neill (2016) found that emotional contagion from leaders to team members occurs in as little as seven minutes of interaction. The kicker? Negative emotions spread faster than positive ones by a factor of 3:1. The Neural Network of Negativity Just as our bodies respond to physical injuries with inflammation - a protective response gone awry - our brains process minor emotional injuries through a similar mechanism. Neuroscience research by Davidson et al. (2019) demonstrates that sustained irritation activates the same neural pathways as physical pain, creating what they call an "emotional inflammatory response." The real danger isn't in the initial trigger. It's in what organizational behavior expert Susan David calls the "emotional amplification loop." When leaders marinate in their annoyance, they unknowingly give permission for their entire team to do the same. The Numbers Tell the Story Here's what the research reveals: Teams with chronically annoyed leaders showed a 24% decrease in psychological safety scores (Edmondson & Lei, 2022) Negative emotional expressions from leaders are remembered 4x longer than positive ones One visible display of leader frustration can impact team productivity for up to 4 hours The Emotional Composting Method Here's the pivot point: While we can't control the initial emotional paper cut, we absolutely own what happens next. David's research makes a crucial distinction between sharing our "wounds" (raw, current irritations) and our "scars" (processed, learned-from experiences). The former spreads contagion; the latter builds resilience. The most emotionally intelligent leaders I know have developed what I call an "annoyance off-ramp" - a practiced response to those first tingles of irritation. They've learned to metabolize minor frustrations before they become major infections. Think of it as emotional composting - turning what could be toxic waste into fertilizer for growth. Three Practices for Emotional Composting Name it to tame it: Label your irritation specifically and privately Track your emotional inflammation rate: How quickly do minor annoyances escalate? Create your personal off-ramp ritual: A specific practice for processing irritation Your Leadership Challenge Gather your leadership team and pose this question: "What's our team's current 'emotional inflammation rate'? If we tracked how quickly minor annoyances escalate into team-wide issues, what patterns would we see?" Identify one specific friction point from the past month and map out how it spread through your organization. What could an "annoyance off-ramp" look like for that particular situation? Remember: Culture isn't just what you celebrate - it's what you tolerate. Including your own emotional reactions. REFERENCES : Barsade, S. G., & O'Neill, O. A. (2016). Manage your emotional culture. Harvard Business Review, 94(1), 58-66. Davidson, R. J., et al. (2019). The neural bases of emotional regulation. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 20(11), 563-572. Edmondson, A. C., & Lei, Z. (2022). Psychological safety: The history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 9, 233-261.
By HPG Info February 11, 2025
Strategies for Moving Past Organizational Gridlock When problems become our pets, we feed them daily. We house them in the corners of our institutions, letting them grow from minor inconveniences into immovable monuments. As educational leaders, we're particularly susceptible to this trap - not because we're ineffective, but precisely because we're busy and dedicated to getting things right. The psychology behind problem hoarding is fascinating. Research by Sheard and Kakabadse (2022) found that educational leaders often develop what they term "complexity attachment" - an unconscious investment in maintaining difficult situations rather than resolving them. This manifests in behaviors like refusing support, rejecting collaboration, and personalizing institutional challenges. The Hidden Cost of Holding On Studies reveal alarming statistics: 65% of educational leaders report spending more than half their time managing recurring problems Teams under problem-hoarding leadership show 41% lower innovation rates Institutional change initiatives fail 73% more often when leaders refuse to delegate challenges Breaking Free: The Three R's of Problem Liberation Release : Acknowledge that holding problems doesn't equal solving them Redistribute : Share challenges across your team's collective wisdom Reimagine : View problems as opportunities for systemic growth The Power of Productive Detachment Recent work by Heifetz and Linsky (2021) suggests that leaders who practice "productive detachment" show significantly higher rates of successful organizational transformation. This means: Separating personal identity from institutional challenges Creating space for multiple solution pathways Embracing collective problem-solving approaches From Hoarding to Harvesting The most effective leaders understand that problem-solving isn't a solitary sport. Fullan's (2023) study of high-performing school districts found that leaders who engaged in "networked improvement communities" solved complex challenges 3.4 times faster than those who tackled issues alone. Your Action Steps Identify one problem you've been "polishing rather than solving" Invite three fresh perspectives to examine the challenge Document the resistance and revelations that emerge Remember: The alternative to problem hoarding isn't problem abandonment - it's problem sharing. References: Edmondson, A. C. (2018). The fearless organization: Creating psychological safety in the workplace for learning, innovation, and growth. Wiley. Fullan, M. (2023). Leading in a culture of change (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass. Heifetz, R. A., & Linsky, M. (2021). Leadership on the line: Staying alive through the dangers of leading (2nd ed.). Harvard Business Review Press. Sheard, G., & Kakabadse, A. P. (2022). Leadership in turbulent times: A study of organizational adaptation and transformation. Journal of Change Management, 22(1), 45-67.
Show More
Share by: