Why The Health Of Your Lead Team Matters (And A Tool To Help Improve It)

September 12, 2022

Why does the health of your leadership team matter?


Healthy teams build reliable systems. Period. I have never observed an unhealthy team that was not stealing the trust, time, and focus of those it was employed to serve. 


We have all worked in unhealthy systems and have a few stories to tell, right?

Healthy systems build healthy culture. Healthy culture attracts (and keeps) your best talent.

 

This is a universal truth seen in our everyday off-campus engagements as well. 


  • At Zappos or Southwest: Healthy teams deliver better service
  • At Costco or Trader Joe’s: Healthy teams yield strong customer loyalty


What is team health?

We often think of ‘healthy’ as being a human characteristic. We consider those healthy behaviors if we take care of ourselves, eat well, and exercise regularly. So how do we translate “healthy” to a team?


Like humans, teams are living organisms.


Teams carry emotions, encounter conflicts, and seek a sense of purpose. Since we spend so much effort on measuring our human health (e.g., weight, blood pressure, body fat, etc.), it makes sense that we should also invest time in measuring team health.


How to measure team health?

For decades, campus systems have conducted employee opinion surveys around organizational climate and culture. They are delivered to your inbox under many names: employee engagement, employee satisfaction, employee commitment, or employee attitudes. 


It’s probably safe to say nearly zero people get excited when it comes time to take the annual employee satisfaction survey. 

Am I right, or am I right?


Employee engagement is the byproduct of team health, and it matters—a lot. In fact, according to a recent Gallup report, organizations with the highest employee engagement outperformed their competitors by 2.5 times. That same Gallup report found that 70% of the U.S. workforce was disengaged, and 20% are actively working to sabotage your system’s strategic objectives. 


What was the number one influencer of team health? The leader’s and the Lead Team’s performance. 


Change is inevitable. Irrelevance isn’t.


But the reality is that far too many campuses aren’t shifting quickly enough.


That’s why I’m on tour with the RECLAIM MOMENTUM {LIVE} Keynote. It’s a value-packed event where we’ll dissect the 6 Lead Measures of Building Irresistible Campus Culture and get equipped with a framework to lead successful change with less resistance.

Register Here

Here are three reactions that I regularly hear from average leaders:


“Team health doesn’t really matter. People will do the job I need because I pay them well.” 


You could be correct, but only if they do simple and repetitive work. For teams who lead people or whose job requires creativity or judgment, the evidence is overwhelming that engagement makes a HUGE difference in their ability to contribute to the institution's goals. 


“My team’s health seems ok. I don’t think it is a problem.”


You may be right, but considering the high disengagement rates, the odds are against you. How would you know for sure?


“My team is beyond hope. Improving their engagement is a lost cause, so I will put my energies elsewhere.”


That's also problematic. Giving up on your Lead Team is giving up on your culture and community. Where your top team goes, so goes the culture. Healthy leaders create healthy culture. 


This is also true if you flip it around. 


The thing that is so powerful about disengagement is that there are so many ways to improve it with such little investment. 


The first (and most potent) step is to start measuring the health of your team and lovingly confront your reality. 


Here is the best news of all. Measuring team health does not need to be a mystery. The narrative can actually pivot from:


“I think our team communicates well”
To - Our team COMMUNICATION score was 3.7 out of 5.


“I think our team connects well with each other”
To – Our team CONNECTION score was 3.1 out of 5. 


“I think our team is aligned with our goals and strategies”
To – Our team ALIGNMENT score was 4.2 out of 5. 


“I think our team is ready to take on a few more new initiatives”
To – Our team CAPACITY score was 2.9 out of 5. 


“I think our team’s performance is out of this world”
To – Our team EXECUTION score was 3.8 out of 5. 


“I think our team operates within a highly reliable system”
To – Our SYSTEMS score was 4.0 out of 5.


Like a fine gemstone, your team culture has facets that, when healthy, become vividly brilliant and attractive to your world. 


These facets are the Lead Measures of your system’s culture:


  1. Communication: The quality of the exchange of internal and external information between leaders and teams. 
  2. Connection: The quality of leader-to-leader relationships and team collaboration. 
  3. Alignment: The aspiration to achieve the same vision through common values, strategies, and goals. 
  4. Capacity: The quality of the conditions allowing for the team to produce at high levels of performance.
  5. Execution: The quality of the team’s ability to take action upon its highest priorities. 
  6. System: The quality of reliable principles and procedures that work as an interconnected network to maximize mission delivery. 

 

Remember: Measuring team health is just one step toward better employee engagement, but this alone is often enough to trigger surprising improvements in team performance. 


Your “Game On” Switch

The Lead Team 360™ Survey is a highly reliable instrument used across hundreds of campus and district sites in the U.S. 

As your organization faces increasing internal and external challenges, the effectiveness of teams in delivering on performance goals will become a key source of difference between those systems that are successful and those that fall behind their competition. 


The Higher Performance Lead Team 360™ is a proven and effective tool to promote social awareness and create transparency in communication through trust, sharing, and increased clarity towards your organization’s expected goals and behaviors. The overall purpose of this feedback process is to optimize Higher team Performance in the Lead Measures of Culture (mentioned above). 


If you are a campus or district leader struggling with average team performance, you will want to access this FREE assessment tool. 


This semester, HPG is offering the Lead Team 360™ FREE to qualified leaders committed to administering the diagnostic across their executive and leadership team(s) of 10 or more. 


Schedule your pre-qualifying call with us with two simple clicks.


Schedule a Call

Change is inevitable. Irrelevance Isn't.


What’s your strategy to RECLAIM YOUR MOMENTUM?


I’m hosting virtual coffee sessions with campus, district, and building leaders this fall to discuss the challenges of leading beyond crisis, where I will share the tips and tools to Reclaim Your Advantage. 


It’s time to build (not rebuild) capacity to lead the uncharted territory ahead. 


You get pushback, opposition, confusion, and anger without a proven strategy.


With better practice, you’ll be equipped to lead something more significant and more impactful than you might ask or imagine. 


Claim your Virtual Coffee here.


Remember, average performance is a choice. 


Trade up for Higher Performance here.

More Blog Articles

By HPG Info February 19, 2025
What fruit flies and frustrated executives have in common Picture this: A minor workplace irritant shows up in your inbox at 8:47 AM. By lunch, it's festered into a full-blown emotional abscess. Sound familiar? You're not alone - and the science behind this emotional contagion is more fascinating than you'd think. Recent research in organizational psychology reveals that leader annoyance acts like an emotional pathogen, spreading through teams with surprising speed and potency. A groundbreaking study by Barsade and O'Neill (2016) found that emotional contagion from leaders to team members occurs in as little as seven minutes of interaction. The kicker? Negative emotions spread faster than positive ones by a factor of 3:1. The Neural Network of Negativity Just as our bodies respond to physical injuries with inflammation - a protective response gone awry - our brains process minor emotional injuries through a similar mechanism. Neuroscience research by Davidson et al. (2019) demonstrates that sustained irritation activates the same neural pathways as physical pain, creating what they call an "emotional inflammatory response." The real danger isn't in the initial trigger. It's in what organizational behavior expert Susan David calls the "emotional amplification loop." When leaders marinate in their annoyance, they unknowingly give permission for their entire team to do the same. The Numbers Tell the Story Here's what the research reveals: Teams with chronically annoyed leaders showed a 24% decrease in psychological safety scores (Edmondson & Lei, 2022) Negative emotional expressions from leaders are remembered 4x longer than positive ones One visible display of leader frustration can impact team productivity for up to 4 hours The Emotional Composting Method Here's the pivot point: While we can't control the initial emotional paper cut, we absolutely own what happens next. David's research makes a crucial distinction between sharing our "wounds" (raw, current irritations) and our "scars" (processed, learned-from experiences). The former spreads contagion; the latter builds resilience. The most emotionally intelligent leaders I know have developed what I call an "annoyance off-ramp" - a practiced response to those first tingles of irritation. They've learned to metabolize minor frustrations before they become major infections. Think of it as emotional composting - turning what could be toxic waste into fertilizer for growth. Three Practices for Emotional Composting Name it to tame it: Label your irritation specifically and privately Track your emotional inflammation rate: How quickly do minor annoyances escalate? Create your personal off-ramp ritual: A specific practice for processing irritation Your Leadership Challenge Gather your leadership team and pose this question: "What's our team's current 'emotional inflammation rate'? If we tracked how quickly minor annoyances escalate into team-wide issues, what patterns would we see?" Identify one specific friction point from the past month and map out how it spread through your organization. What could an "annoyance off-ramp" look like for that particular situation? Remember: Culture isn't just what you celebrate - it's what you tolerate. Including your own emotional reactions. REFERENCES : Barsade, S. G., & O'Neill, O. A. (2016). Manage your emotional culture. Harvard Business Review, 94(1), 58-66. Davidson, R. J., et al. (2019). The neural bases of emotional regulation. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 20(11), 563-572. Edmondson, A. C., & Lei, Z. (2022). Psychological safety: The history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 9, 233-261.
By HPG Info February 11, 2025
Strategies for Moving Past Organizational Gridlock When problems become our pets, we feed them daily. We house them in the corners of our institutions, letting them grow from minor inconveniences into immovable monuments. As educational leaders, we're particularly susceptible to this trap - not because we're ineffective, but precisely because we're busy and dedicated to getting things right. The psychology behind problem hoarding is fascinating. Research by Sheard and Kakabadse (2022) found that educational leaders often develop what they term "complexity attachment" - an unconscious investment in maintaining difficult situations rather than resolving them. This manifests in behaviors like refusing support, rejecting collaboration, and personalizing institutional challenges. The Hidden Cost of Holding On Studies reveal alarming statistics: 65% of educational leaders report spending more than half their time managing recurring problems Teams under problem-hoarding leadership show 41% lower innovation rates Institutional change initiatives fail 73% more often when leaders refuse to delegate challenges Breaking Free: The Three R's of Problem Liberation Release : Acknowledge that holding problems doesn't equal solving them Redistribute : Share challenges across your team's collective wisdom Reimagine : View problems as opportunities for systemic growth The Power of Productive Detachment Recent work by Heifetz and Linsky (2021) suggests that leaders who practice "productive detachment" show significantly higher rates of successful organizational transformation. This means: Separating personal identity from institutional challenges Creating space for multiple solution pathways Embracing collective problem-solving approaches From Hoarding to Harvesting The most effective leaders understand that problem-solving isn't a solitary sport. Fullan's (2023) study of high-performing school districts found that leaders who engaged in "networked improvement communities" solved complex challenges 3.4 times faster than those who tackled issues alone. Your Action Steps Identify one problem you've been "polishing rather than solving" Invite three fresh perspectives to examine the challenge Document the resistance and revelations that emerge Remember: The alternative to problem hoarding isn't problem abandonment - it's problem sharing. References: Edmondson, A. C. (2018). The fearless organization: Creating psychological safety in the workplace for learning, innovation, and growth. Wiley. Fullan, M. (2023). Leading in a culture of change (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass. Heifetz, R. A., & Linsky, M. (2021). Leadership on the line: Staying alive through the dangers of leading (2nd ed.). Harvard Business Review Press. Sheard, G., & Kakabadse, A. P. (2022). Leadership in turbulent times: A study of organizational adaptation and transformation. Journal of Change Management, 22(1), 45-67.
Show More
Share by: