Think Again. Ousting The “In-Person Is Best” Work Bias

November 1, 2022

It’s not going away. The appeal to work remotely has become more valued than ever before, especially for your youngest talent. 


Employee engagement has reached frightening lows in just about every sector, which understandably has leaders deeply worried and looking for answers to see them through the Great Reshuffle. This disruption started (allegedly) when the pandemic forced many into remote work, and we stopped being together. 


Indeed, having your people working side by side is the magical solution to everything returning to its ideal state, right?


Nope. For starters, surveys consistently show that people are looking for flexibility and choice about where they work, not less. The ability to work remotely has become more valued than ever before, and that’s not going away, particularly given that these trends are significantly more robust among younger workers.


think again about the in-person work bias

Even in organizations that remain committed to offering employees significant remote or hybrid work, there is often a “rub” of under-aiming among Boomer and Xer leaders who believe that full parking lots are the sign of a successful system. 


As learning professionals, we hear many biases regarding what in-person experiences can achieve.


With respect and love for the profession, I aim to provoke leaders and teams to stretch their thinking and check for bias as all of us increasingly move into uncharted territory with an abundance of promise. 


What follows are the four biases that may not be 100% accurate and, when left fixed within systems, may interfere with your strategic promises to your community. 


Bias #1: In-person learning is most effective

I learned best in person. I led campuses and districts where this was the best practice as well. I’m 100% biased because this was my lived experience, but there is something sneaky about this one. From my observation, many leaders who repeat this myth are not always aware of the complexities of learning effectiveness today — they want to bring people physically together, and “learning” seems like a solid justification. 


The smarter we become, the better excuses we can construct. 

The excuse that learning (and work) is more effective in person is demonstrably false. When one considers that the ideal learning process must hold both meaningful practice and feedback, in-person learning often is less impactful than well-designed virtual learning. 


Bias #2: In-person everything helps strengthen campus culture

Increasingly, we hear leaders argue that in-person learning events are necessary because it significantly contributes to strengthening team culture. It’s worthwhile to consider, for a moment, whether that can even be true. After all, culture is the shared beliefs, values, norms, and habits that are held and practiced regularly. Culture is about how we work together, how we’re expected to behave with one another, the goals we collectively pursue, and the way we respond to challenges and setbacks. In other words, we experience culture all day, every day, when working together. 


Virtual experiences are becoming more of our experience and a part of our culture. 

Social and community events away from workstations can create a fondness amongst leaders and teams (especially if the food and drink are yummy, right)? Yes. Such events can be visible and memorable opportunities to celebrate a culture. However, they certainly aren’t where culture is exclusively built. 


Culture is built in the everyday exchanges with your people and teams – virtually and in person.


You deserve to stop scurrying in confusion and busyness.


Reclaim Your Momentum {LIVE}

✅ Reclaim Your Time

✅ Reclaim Your Energy

✅ Reclaim Your Priorities


”Wow! I didn’t realize I was in desperate need of this talk and these tools in my life.”


“This message so profoundly impacted us. We are now beginning to edit out the unhealthy team behaviors interfering with our performance.


“The timing of this message could not have been better for the health of our team.”


Without a new strategy and approach, it's easy to continue to:

➜ Sacrifice self and family on the altar of work

➜ Overcommit and underdeliver

➜ Be busy but no longer brilliant.

➜ Juggle more priorities than what we can complete.


Worst of all, other people — other tasks, jobs, and projects — will continue to hijack your life.


It’s time to change that by implementing a strategy that works.


Reclaim Your Momentum {LIVE} is a two-hour keynote for campus/district leaders and their teams.


This interactive session will inspire, challenge, and equip your team to accelerate healthy team culture and overall team performance. 


Your team will leave this session with the following:

  • A shaper clarity of your unique leadership superpower we call your Natural Leadership Profile
  • A callable framework for building Higher Performance team and culture
  • Practical tools to accelerate team communication, connection, alignment, capacity, and execution


Book Your Team Retreat Today – Here




Book Your Team Retreat

Bias #3: People need a break from their devices

There is no question that your people are feeling burned out and overworked. Staring at our screens all day and enduring back-to-back virtual meetings does not help the work/life balance and mental health yuck permeating our people. 


However, it’s absurd when we believe that sending our people to a conference center for two days to rotate between ballroom and breakout rooms is a better engagement strategy.


If your people spend too much time staring at their devices daily, you should encourage them to step away intentionally and frequently. Next time you attend that multi-day learning event, look around the room and count how many people are not lost in their screens. 


Just sayin’.


I believe your people experience more significant stress from the backlog of work and emails that pile up when sent on an off-site learning journey. The solution will be found in thinking differently about work/life balance, mental health, networking, and access to best practices. 


Don’t fall to the conspiracy bias that your single shot of in-person well-being workshops will make that great of a dent. 


Bias #4: Real connection can only be made in person

When we operated exclusively in person, we had clear norms and cognitive schemas that provided us with implicit “scripts” for how to interact with people. We watched others do it throughout our lives and made this our way. 

Admittedly, in the early days of the pandemic, trying to get to know people virtually felt very weird for those of us trying to do it for the first time. We felt lost. 

  • Do I keep my camera on? 
  • Am I supposed to look at the person speaking?
  • Will they notice if I don’t? 
  • How do I excuse myself if a conversation gets awkward? 
  • Should I be raising my “hand” to speak?
  • When is it okay to come off mute? 
  • Is it okay that my cat keeps running around in the background?

This myth that real connection can only be made in person directly results from risk aversion.


If I don’t know how to do something, it’s easier to say it doesn’t work… and call it a day.


Networking and collaborating virtually still aren’t entirely natural to many of us, though the initial panic of the unfamiliar does seem to have faded. With time and a little more practice, we’ll do what human beings have always done when new ways of communicating emerge (think of the telephone, emailing, texting, and social media): We’ll all get the hang of it. 


Just keep swimming. 


It still is important to be together.


All that said, people universally want opportunities for in-person connection. A recent survey found that two-thirds of employees wish in-person work and collaboration opportunities to be a part of their forever planning. It also found that they equally wanted to be a part of a caring culture.


Advantage in-person. 


Unarguably, the natural expressions of warmth and empathy that give the impression of caring in humans can be more sincere and more powerful when we’re physically together. That’s because we have all communication cues: words, vocal tone, facial expressions, gestures, and body language. 


I’m a hugger, and the new Zoom updates can’t do that for me. 


To make the most of those in-person opportunities for connection, we need to make them optional, tactical, and intentional.


Optional

Most leaders I serve are tempted to think they know what’s best for their people. Don’t hate me, but don’t force them to come together if they are not fired up about the idea. Required attendance requires nothing more than compliance. 


Turning one’s heartlight (desire) off will also cause their headlight (competence) to be off. 


Autonomy and the feeling of choice have long been recognized as fundamental human motivators, and the campuses that offer more options can have an advantage in the talent competition. My experience post-pandemic is that roughly half of the leaders would instead learn virtually if given the opportunity. 


Leaders should routinely ask themselves: Am I so sure that being in person for this initiative is needed, and where might I be alienating my people?


Tactical

Fact: People with little in common apart from the campus they work for don’t usually conduct a lot of “connecting” with new people at events. What they do, overwhelmingly, is hang around the people they already know. Yes, new connections can happen when unfamiliar groups of people convene for short, episodic experiences; however, in my experience, these interactions tend to be cordial but lacking in substance.


The real value of in-person events lies in deepening existing connections, particularly for teams of people who work together. That’s where the opportunity to send “social signals” — signals that convey our respect, liking, and empathy for others — benefit from our ability to amplify them through our physical presence (e.g., through smiles, lasting eye contact, gestures, etc.). These signals matter most for people whose substantive connections — who have meaningful things in common, work together frequently, or share common goals.


Intentional

The benefits of in-person connection don’t just “happen.” Conditions that encourage something beyond surface-level conversation and small talk, in both structured and unstructured ways, need to be created. Decades of research have identified the kinds of activities that tend to enhance social bonding, including the following:

  • Creative problem solving
  • Perspective sharing
  • Rituals
  • Humor
  • Food

It’s worth noting that while being physically together can amplify the impact of these activities, you can still utilize them virtually to powerful effect. The challenge is often finding ones that work well in a virtual environment. 



Higher Performance Group {HPG} has listened and recently responded to the high demand for virtual team development for campus/district leadership teams. 

Looking to get a snapshot of your team's overall health?


Lead Team 360™

Diagnose your current leadership team health in the Lead Measures of Culture


Free 30-Minute Consultation Call

Looking for monthly workshops for your people leaders?


Lead Team Institute {LTI}

A 12-workshop series for campus teams on-site, virtual, or hybrid


Enroll in Our Team Workshop Series

Our ways of working have been permanently disrupted. We aren’t going back, which isn’t a bad thing. Sure, we have some things to figure out. Getting to a better tomorrow means being willing to critically question our assumptions about what people need to be fully engaged, fulfilled, and productive. 


It means restraining the urge to grasp what feels like “easy” answers and accepting change and the hard choices that sometimes come with it. 


It means listening to your people, trusting their judgment, and using the science of human behavior to create optimal conditions under which they can connect and thrive. 


Don’t worry…you’ll get the hang of it.


We’ll get the hang of it. 






More Blog Articles

By HPG Info July 27, 2026
Why the seven forces driving burnout in your cabinet move exactly the way a piano does — and why the room adjusts to the wrongness long before anyone names it. Twenty years ago, I moved my family away from everything they knew. Not across town. Across area codes — away from the school where I was principal, away from grandparents, away from the only bedrooms my three kids had ever slept in, away from every friendship they'd built since kindergarten. I told my wife it was the right move for our family. I still believe that. But telling a nine-year-old “this is the right move for our family” lands about as well as telling your cabinet a reorg is the right move for the institution. Correct. Unpersuasive. Deeply unwelcome. So we did what desperate, loving parents do. Ice cream. A puppy negotiation I'm still not proud of. And one purchase that turned out to matter more than either: a baby grand piano for the new house. That piano is still in my living room. Twenty years, three kids, and a tuner later — a woman who showed up twice a year for over a decade and never once used the word “burnout” — here's what she taught me about running a cabinet, without ever meaning to. A piano doesn't fail all at once. It drifts. One string at a time, one season at a time, so slowly that everyone living inside the house adjusts to the wrongness without ever naming it. Your leadership team is doing the exact same thing right now. And the people closest to it — the ones playing it every single day — are the last people on earth who'll hear it. THE DIAGNOSIS · NOTHING BROKE. IT DRIFTED. Let's talk about drift like adults who've sat through enough strategic planning retreats to know the difference between a crisis and a slow leak. When's the last time a VP in your cabinet pushed back — and meant it? Nobody's cabinet collapses on a Tuesday. What actually happens is smaller and slower: the VP who used to push back in meetings stops pushing back. The initiative that launched with real energy in August is, by February, running on habit and a group chat nobody reads anymore. The meeting that used to run ninety minutes now runs sixty — not because anyone got more efficient, but because half the room quietly decided the extra thirty minutes of honesty wasn't worth it. None of that shows up on a dashboard. It shows up the way a piano goes flat — not as an event, but as an accumulation. By the time someone finally names it (usually a board member, not gently), you're not looking at one broken string. You're looking at an instrument nobody's tuned in two years, and a room full of good people who adjusted to the wrongness because it arrived one cent at a time. (This is the part where I'm supposed to tell you to “communicate more.” You already knew that. The real problem isn't communication. It's that nobody in your cabinet has a name for what's actually going wrong — so everyone quietly assumes it's just them.) Structure is never neutral. Every system is a self-portrait of whoever built it — and most of yours was painted before you ever took the seat. ❞ Which means the villain was never the people in the room. Individual brilliance, individual empathy, individual self-awareness — all present, all functioning. Multiply eight individually excellent people by a system nobody's maintaining, and the output doesn't hold. That's not a people problem. That's structural neglect wearing a people costume. What looks like burnout in your cabinet is usually the rational response of a capable person inside a broken system. ❞ (This is the exact gap Burnout Force was built to name — not another framework asking your cabinet to try harder individually, but a diagnostic for the structural neglect sitting underneath what looks like burnout. Seven forces, seven distinct mechanisms, each requiring its own fix — the same way a tuner never fixes “the piano,” she fixes one string at a time. More on all seven in a moment.) THE PIANO TUNING METHOD — OR WHY SEVEN FORCES, NOT ONE A piano has seven notes before the octave repeats. Do, Re, Mi, Fa, Sol, La, Ti. Seven distinct tones, each capable of going wrong in its own particular way, each requiring its own fix. A tuner doesn't fix “the piano” — she fixes seven specific things, one string tension at a time. Here's the part most people miss: the seventh string never sounds right until the first one's fixed. Burnout Force works the same way. Not one villain. Seven — each with a distinct mechanism, each recognizable once you know what you're listening for. 1 · Fragmentation — Unisons, Out of Sync Most piano notes aren't a single string — they're two or three strings tuned to the exact same pitch, meant to ring as one voice. Drift even slightly apart, and the note doesn't go silent. It goes blurry. Chorused. Technically playing, technically wrong. That's Fragmentation: a cabinet where everyone's still showing up, still contributing, and the collective sound is somehow muddier than any one of them alone. 2 · Exhaustion — String Tension Under Constant Load Piano wire doesn't need to be struck to lose its tension. Sustained load alone, with no release, causes metal fatigue — the string goes flat just from sitting there under pressure. There's an old performance formula worth borrowing here: performance equals potential, minus interference. Not potential plus effort. Your best people are going flat the same way — not from one hard day, but from load with no release, for long enough that flat becomes their normal. 3 · Isolation — Notes That Won't Resonate Together Piano strings produce overtones — secondary frequencies that aren't perfectly clean multiples of the main pitch. Tuners call this inharmonicity: individually well-tuned notes can still clash rather than support each other in a chord. A cabinet can be full of individually excellent leaders who still don't resonate together, because nobody ever tuned them to each other. (Coal miners didn't bring a canary into the mine for company — they brought it as an instrument. When the person who used to drive every meeting suddenly goes quiet in the back row, that's not an attitude problem. That's a reading coming off the instrument.) 4 · Scarcity — Compensation That Crowds the Room When a piano is stretched to compensate for inharmonicity, one note's resonance can crowd out another's — more presence for one string at the expense of the one beside it. Scarcity is the belief that someone else's win is quietly your loss. It's rarely true. It's a tuning problem mistaken for a competition. 5 · Comparison — The Sound of Two Things Measured Against Each Other When two strings are close but not exactly matched, you hear an actual physical pulsing — tuners call it a “beat.” It's the audible result of two things being judged against each other instead of each being allowed to be itself. Comparison in a cabinet works the same way: audible, measurable, and it doesn't resolve on its own. 6 · Noise — Losing the Reference Point Every piano is tuned from one reference octave first — usually the one built around middle C — and everything else is set relative to it. If that reference is never revisited, the whole instrument can be internally consistent with itself and still be wrong, because the one thing everything else depends on was never checked. That's Noise: a cabinet that's stopped returning to its actual reference point and started tuning to whatever's loudest that week. 7 · Drift — The One That Doesn't Announce Itself And then there's the one nobody has to cause. Piano tuners genuinely use this word: drift — the slow, seasonal, nobody-touched-anything loss of pitch that happens just from humidity and temperature changing in the room. No event. No single decision. Just time, and an environment nobody adjusted for. This is the force behind the other six — and the one every leader I know insists could never happen to them, right up until the year it does. WHY FOUR, LIVE — THE AMPLIFICATION ENGINE Here's the part most burnout content skips: not all seven forces are equally random. Four of them are the causal engine — they manufacture the other three. Fragmentation produces Exhaustion (coordinating around broken structure is its own kind of tired). Exhaustion produces Isolation (depleted people stop reaching for each other; reaching itself becomes the thing they can no longer afford). Isolation produces Scarcity (a cabinet that's stopped resonating together starts believing there isn't enough credit, attention, or budget to go around). And Scarcity feeds straight back into Fragmentation — louder, the second time through. Comparison, Noise, and Drift sit downstream of all four. Fix the engine, and the other three get dramatically easier for your own people to spot and name themselves. You cannot fix the seventh string by tightening it harder. You fix the first one, and the seventh gets easier to hear. ❞ I didn't learn any of this from a leadership book. I learned it from the same tuner — never used the word “burnout,” never needed to. She just knew the instrument needed her back, regularly, not once and done. ❝ Your cabinet needs the same thing. Not a single retreat. Not one framework, delivered once, expected to hold. A tuner. A rhythm. Someone who comes back. ❞ THE APPLICATION · MONDAY MORNING Here's what to do Monday morning (assuming your cabinet isn't already visibly out of tune — in which case, start today): Step 1 — Name your loudest string. (15 minutes) Of the seven forces, which one is making the most noise in your cabinet right now? Don't overthink it. Your gut answer is usually the correct diagnosis your data hasn't caught up to yet. Step 2 — Ask your cabinet the “beat” question. (20 minutes, next meeting) Ask directly: “Where do two of us sound like we're being measured against each other instead of just doing our own job well?” That's Comparison, made audible. You'll hear the beat the moment someone answers honestly. Step 3 — Schedule the return visit. (5 minutes) A piano tuned once and never revisited drifts right back. Put a recurring cabinet health conversation on the calendar — quarterly, minimum. The tuner's value was never the single visit. It was the relationship. “We don't have time for this.” You're already spending time managing the symptoms of an out-of-tune cabinet — the redundant meetings, the parking-lot conversations, the initiative that quietly died in month four. That time is already being spent. You're just spending it on maintenance instead of tuning. “My team will think this is soft.” Nobody thinks a piano tuner is soft. She shows up with a very specific diagnosis for a very specific string, and the room sounds different when she leaves. Precision isn't soft. Vague inspiration is soft. This isn't that. THE MATURITY SHIFT Immature leaders think: “We need a retreat to fix morale.” Mature leaders think: “We need a rhythm to maintain the instrument.” Immature leaders wait for the piano to sound obviously wrong before calling anyone. Mature leaders schedule the tuner before the drift is audible to the room. The uncomfortable truth: your cabinet didn't break. It drifted — one string, one season, one quiet accommodation at a time — and nobody wrote it down because nothing dramatic ever happened on any single day. The optimistic reframe: drift is the one force that responds completely to maintenance. You don't need a new piano. You need someone who comes back. Your worth was never conditional on the note holding perfectly. It just needs someone willing to notice when it doesn't — and come back. ❞ Your turn: Which of the seven strings is out of tune in your cabinet right now? Name it in the comments — the word is enough. Tag the person on your team who'd hear it the second you said it out loud. BURNOUT FORCE Burnout Force is the name for what's actually happening — seven specific, researched forces, each with its own mechanism, each solvable once it's named correctly. The keynote fights the first four, live, together, with your cabinet in the room — the causal engine, the ones everything else grows out of. The book carries all seven, in full, with the research behind each one, so your team can finish the tune-up without me there. This isn't another framework to add to the pile you already haven't implemented. It's a diagnostic — built from work across 987 leadership teams in 43 states — for naming precisely which of the seven forces is loudest in your institution right now, and what actually reverses it. 📊 3x performance improvement · 29% higher engagement · 27% better organizational outcomes · zero increase in burnout — because these teams stopped treating exhaustion as a personal failing and started treating it as a structural, solvable problem. If you already know which string is out of tune in your cabinet, the conversation about whether Burnout Force is the right next step for your institution is a short one. Book 30 minutes and let's have it. higherperformancegroup.com/burnout-force FOUND VALUE IN THIS? Help another leader hear their own drift: → Repost with the force that's loudest in your cabinet right now. → Tag a leader who'd recognize this the moment they read it. → Comment with the last time something on your team went quietly out of tune — and nobody said anything for months.  The more leaders who learn to hear the drift before the crisis, the fewer institutions have to relearn this the hard way. Follow DR. JOE HILL and Higher Performance Group for weekly Team Intelligence insights.
By HPG Info July 21, 2026
That's the Problem. Your best cabinet member is running on a parking brake nobody's ever named — and everyone, including them, is calling it dedication. Last week, a superintendent colleauge - Jay Poroda posted about his dog Daisy — a 70-pound labradoodle who skips group play, gets nervous around strangers, and only, only comes alive for a yellow tennis ball. Not red. Not orange. Yellow. I left a comment: "Daisy going only for yellow is the whole argument for fit over effort — she's not lazy about the others, she's just not spending energy on what isn't hers to chase. What's the yellow tennis ball in your work right now?" Jay's answer: "Right now it's a capital improvement project for our district — the thing that outlasts me. Daisy would approve. I just try not to bat the building plans around." Good exchange. But I want to take it somewhere neither of us went. I have a dog too. Ms. Etta. People think she's four or five. She turns eleven next month. Etta doesn't have a yellow-ball problem. Etta has a stopping problem. She'd fetch until her legs gave out — no off-switch, no internal "enough." She's eleven and not seven because somebody with more sense than her keeps saying stop. That's not a dog story. That's your best cabinet member. THE DIAGNOSIS · WHY YOUR BEST PERFORMER IS YOUR BIGGEST EXPOSURE You know the person. Maybe it's you. Takes the 6 AM call, chairs three committees, still remembers every kid's name. (The email lands at 11:47 PM, and you think "dedication" — not "nobody has ever told this person to stop.") You can't treat pain you haven't diagnosed. So here's the diagnosis, precisely: this isn't a talk about stress, and it isn't a talk about resilience. Stress resolves. A hard board meeting is stress. A fire drill is stress. What doesn't resolve — what compounds inside a system built to compound it — is burnout. Not the tired version. Something structural: a system extracting capacity, belief, and mission-fuel from the people most committed to it. Coal miners didn't carry a canary as a pet. They carried it as an instrument. When it went quiet, that was data — the air was already unlivable, long before it reached the miners. Your most committed people are the canaries. Etta is the canary that never goes quiet — she'd keep singing right up until her legs gave out. That's not resilience. That's exactly the problem. The canary that won't stop singing is the one you have to build a system around, because it will never save itself. Here's the part most cabinets skip: you can be stacked with brilliant people and still have nobody positioned to see a colleague redlining before they collapse. Smart gets hired for. Watching each other doesn't. (This is the exact gap the Burnout Force keynote and book close — not another resilience training, not a Wellness Wednesday with cucumber water in the break room, but a structural diagnosis of the forces draining your most committed people before anyone thinks to ask if they're okay. More shortly.) THE FORMULA · WHY EFFORT ISN'T THE VARIABLE Performance psychologist Timothy Gallwey built an equation that should be taped inside every cabinet room in the country: performance equals potential, minus interference. Not potential plus effort. P = p - i Most educational leaders have it backwards — pressing the accelerator harder while a parking brake nobody named stays locked. The average leadership team in our research spends roughly 40% of the workweek on tasks that only exist because something upstream is broken. Sixteen hours. Two full workdays. Every week. Spent servicing damage a broken system did to itself — handed to the one person who cares too much to say no. That's not commitment. That's interference — and it's invisible to almost everyone carrying it, because it doesn't look like failure. It looks like a very busy Tuesday. Gallup finds 62% of employees aren't engaged — not because they stopped caring, but because diminishing capacity is meeting a hundred percent of the workload. Healthcare burnout tops 60%. New teachers leave within five years at rates near 50%. Almost none of that loss is the actual work. Almost all of it is interference nobody audited. Underneath it is a sentence, not a skill gap: I must be indispensable to matter. That's what keeps a leader — or a labradoodle — running long after "enough" should have kicked in. It isn't ambition. It's a substitute for a question nobody's answered yet. THE ARTIFACT · WHAT A BRAKE AUDIT ACTUALLY FINDS Skip the case study. Here's what a real Brake Audit log looks like — names removed, pulled from our research: Month 1 — "Two departments have never held a joint meeting. Every project between them runs through the CAO as translator. Six hours a week, minimum." Month 1 — "She answers email at 6:15 AM. Nobody asked her to. Nobody told her not to." Month 4 — "First missed deadline in two years. Cabinet reads it as a bad week." Month 6 — "Answers in cabinet meetings get shorter. Nobody names it." Month 7 — Brake Audit installed. One task eliminated: a joint department sync replaces the CAO-as-translator. Six hours a week, returned. Month 18 — Zero comparable losses. Same person. Same ambition. Different brake. That's not a story I'm telling you — it's a pattern showing up cabinet after cabinet. The good ones almost never announce they're burning out. They just get quieter, one meeting at a time, until the quiet gets mistaken for calm. The gap between Month 1 and Month 7 wasn't more resilience. It was eleven months and a $41,000 search a different cabinet is running right now — for someone whose name you don't know yet — because nobody named the brake before it locked. WHAT TO DO BEFORE YOUR NEXT CABINET MEETING Skip the retreat. Do this instead: Run the Canary Audit (20 minutes). Go through your cabinet, one person at a time. Who would tell you the truth if they were past capacity — and who would just keep singing until they went quiet? Write both lists. The second list is your exposure. More than one name on it isn't a resilience problem. It's an interference problem with excellent attendance. Run a Brake Audit — out loud (one meeting). Name every task on the table that exists only because something upstream is broken — a form nobody killed, a handoff nobody clarified, a decision made twice at the wrong level. Eliminate one. You're not asking your team to feel more. You're asking them to see the interference they've been mistaking for commitment. Name the sentence when it shows up (ongoing). Next time someone's visibly past capacity, say it out loud instead of admiring the work ethic in silence: "I'm naming this because I care what you're building, not because I doubt your commitment." Usually what's underneath isn't passion — it's I must be indispensable to matter, quietly running the show. Naming it isn't therapy. It's data. Then you adjust the load. "My best people would resent being told to slow down." Less than the district resents them six months into their eventual leave of absence. You're not asking them to want less — you're asking a Brake Audit to catch what their own adrenaline can't. The leaders who resist this hardest usually need it most. That's not a coincidence. That's the interference talking. "We don't have the bandwidth for a new protocol." You have the bandwidth to lose your CAO for eight months and run a national search. That's the actual cost of skipping this. The audit takes one meeting to install. The alternative takes a year to recover from. THE MATURITY SHIFT Immature leaders think: "My best people just need better resilience training." Mature leaders think: "My best people don't have a resilience problem. They have an interference problem I haven't audited." Immature leaders treat exhaustion as loyalty and quietly reward it with more work. Mature leaders treat exhaustion as a signal and build the system that removes interference before it becomes a resignation letter. Immature leaders keep the canary singing longer by praising the song. Mature leaders build the system that lets the canary rest before it goes quiet. Ms. Etta doesn't know she's eleven. She'd fetch until her legs gave out and call it Tuesday. She's still here because somebody with more sense than her keeps the ball in the drawer sometimes. Your best cabinet member doesn't know they're the canary either. That's not a character flaw in them. It's an interference problem you haven't audited — and a sentence running the room in the dark: I must be indispensable to matter. Name them in the comments — the person on your cabinet running on the brake right now. Then tell us why. That's the part that actually helps the next reader see themselves. THE BURNOUT FORCE · WHY THIS ISN'T A RESILIENCE PROBLEM Most leadership development treats exhaustion as an individual wellness problem — a meditation app stipend, a "self-care" breakout at the annual retreat, a years-of-service pin that mostly proves someone stayed. None of that touches the system extracting capacity from your best people. Here's the honest question worth sitting with: where's the gap between what your cabinet is capable of collectively — and what interference is quietly costing you before anyone's named it? The Burnout Force names seven structural forces working against every leadership team right now. Here are the first four: 🔗 Fragmentation — the silo tax that makes good work disappear between offices that never talk to each other. 🔋 Exhaustion — the parking brake we just walked through. 🫥 Isolation — the way good people stop reaching out once asking for help gets expensive enough. 🍽️ Scarcity — the empty table. Stanford's Sendhil Mullainathan found a scarcity mindset alone costs the cognitive equivalent of thirteen IQ points — the tax is neurological, not emotional. None of these are personality problems. They're systems. Systems don't care who's standing in them. Three more wait past the ones we named live — comparison, noise, and drift — each with its own research trail, each just as invisible until it's named. Across our own research — 987 leadership teams, 43 states — 82% report feeling marginalized or undervalued. MIT's Human Dynamics Lab found fragmented teams lose up to 60% of their energy to coordination drag. If that gap doesn't close on its own over the next two years, what does it actually cost you — not in dollars, in the people you can't afford to lose? The keynote walks your cabinet live through the first four forces — and the wound underneath each — so your team names the pattern themselves, before anyone pitches them anything. The book carries all seven, cover to cover. Two ways in this week: an hour with the keynote, or an afternoon with the book. higherperformancegroup.com/burnout-force Found something here worth passing on?  → Repost with the name of the person on your team who needs a brake audit, not a pep talk → Tag the leader you've watched run without one → Comment with what redlining actually cost your institution — the real number, not the polished one Follow DR. JOE HILL and Higher Performance Group for weekly Team Intelligence insights.
Show More