The Introvert Advantage: Overcoming Perceptions of Incompetence and Disengagement

November 7, 2023

A while back, a trusted VP told me his boss was concerned about his ongoing performance in their weekly executive team meeting. Specifically, he got this feedback:


“You’re not jumping into our team conversation fast enough!”


In agreement with the feedback, he shook his head and added that he hates the awkward silence in some meetings when his peers look at him, expecting him to say something. 


“I hate the pressure of this, but I have a hard time processing with my mouth. I need time and quiet to think things out before I say them.”

introvert advantage

As we started pulling this apart to problem solve, I couldn’t help but empathize. Many leaders (me included) who prefer to fully process ideas before responding can get caught off guard when others want them to move faster. This can be incredibly challenging for those of us who naturally make decisions in our heads and then speak when that idea is fully baked.


Like this VP, I struggled with this early in my educational career, but it became a more apparent issue as I crawled up the organizational chart. Yup, I was actually negatively critiqued in a performance review as being “aloof.”


As a leader, it’s important to engage in the moment. At the executive level, it’s essential.


Our Western culture typically perceives silence in one of two ways:


  1. The leader isn’t competent.
  2. The leader is disengaged. 


Ironically, sometimes those who are naturally quieter are the ones thinking most deeply about the issue at hand — but then get caught off guard when asked for immediate input.


As a campus and district leader for nearly three decades, I have observed thousands of hours of meetings. I've seen many great examples and countless poor episodes of team talk. While there are several tactics to help build team cohesion and conversational turn-taking, I often return to a simple, three-step framework: question, example, and thought.


Start with a Question

One thing that interferes with leaders speaking up is needing more information to state an opinion. As a result, some of us freeze, fearful that our desire to get into the conversation might leave us saying something prematurely.


Instead, a valid starting point is to ask a clarifying question. A helpful practice is to listen through the lens of this question:


What else do I need to know to form an opinion about this?


Make a list of questions that arise as you listen. Then, once it's time for you to speak up, here's one way to begin:


Before I jump in, I have a quick, clarifying question…


Then, state your question(s) and listen to how your colleagues respond. If the answer isn't satisfactory, you may suggest additional information is needed before sharing your opinion or decision. 


If your question elicits more clarity, it provides a path to say more.


I am regularly surprised by how often a clarifying question (or two) can change the entire direction of a conversation — and sometimes surface critical information that triggers a new decision or opinion. This trend is so consistent that we mandate time for clarifying questions in all our HPG Divisional Core Group coaching sessions when addressing situations that teams share.


Starting with a question before you speak up does three things: 


  1. It gets you into the conversation.
  2. It provides you a moment to consider new information.
  3. It gets you used to jumping in. 


All three will help you build the needed reps to strengthen your executive presence as an introvert. 


Introducing my NEW workshop for campus leadership teams:


Equipping YOUR Executive Leaders to BUILD Higher Performance Teams


Book the Workshop Today!


Cite an Example

You may be ready to say more once you've asked a clarifying question (or two). Rather than immediately responding with a definite end to the conversation, such as “Approved!” or “That's not going to work,” you might consider this second transitionary step.


Citing an example is a helpful way to keep the conversation moving forward while leaving open more dialogue opportunities.


A while back, I observed a strategy conversation where several leaders had begun moving in a new direction for a new campus initiative. It became clear that one team member in the room was a bit uncomfortable with her team's direction.


Rather than outright criticize the direction, the person (with valid concern) shared a detailed story about another team she'd been on that tried a similar tactic, only to see it backfire. She was willing to support a test run and suggested that her colleagues move into this decision with prudence and care.


Anybody can share a hot take, but citing a specific example addressing the topic is more credible.


Share an Initial Thought

When it's not yet time for a more definitive statement, sharing an initial thought is a helpful next step.


Many introverted leaders fail to engage in dialogue because they are concerned that anything they say will be interpreted as a final decision — or read as their entire body of thinking on a topic.


While that can happen, it's not practical to sit quietly through interactions or expect to find regular, protracted time for research and thinking. Even when this is possible, others often read consistent silence poorly and are hasty to make judgments.


That's why splitting the difference can be helpful. I've used this phrase many times when I've found myself wanting to engage in a conversation but not quite ready to be definitive:


“I have an initial thought…”


Starting that way signals that you're engaged and involved and that your thinking may still change.


Here's How it Sounds

Here's how it sounds to start if I started with a question, cited an example, and shared an initial thought. 


This is (hypothetically) a team meeting to consider a new computer system.
I first asked this question: 

  • Before we go to the next point, could I ask a quick clarifying question? Much has been shared about the new data system we're considering. What's unclear is what kind of training and onboarding will be required from us. Do we know what it looks like for this academic year?


The subsequent dialogue didn't elicit a clear answer, so I continued with
an example:

  • A few years back, another division I led purchased a new system similar to what we are considering. This was a unilateral decision, and many of the first adopters became frustrated with the pilot edition as it had several bugs that threw excessive errors to the point that the essential data we needed was no longer trusted. This became problematic to the success of future change this team needed to manage and diminished team trust between staff and administration. 


There was additional discussion, and it appeared the purchase would move forward. When I was asked if I would support it, this was my
initial thought:

  • Since the plan is to move forward, my initial thought is to do a test with a smaller subgroup of the division. Suppose we do an experimental run on a volunteer basis with some creative incentives. In that case, we'll know if there's an issue before making a more significant investment and perhaps diminishing the trust of our teams. 


While the team continued with the original plan, my contributions provided cautionary processing with the team adapting their plan more wisely and quickly than they otherwise might have.


Utilizing the three steps of question, example, and thought will help you consistently engage in conversations and influence what comes next.


Related Reading


Applications Open!

Applications are open for our new workshop – Equipping YOUR Executive Leaders to BUILD Higher Performance Teams. — But don’t delay! We are generally able to honor better schedule preferences for earlier applicants.


Through a proven framework, this highly engaging team workshop is focused on the immediate, practical ways to build Healthy Teams and Highly Reliable Systems. 


If that kind of movement is essential for you and your system’s performance, I invite you to consider this limited-time offer to accelerate your leadership team development.


If you are serious about differentiating yourself from the noise of average teams, I want to hear from you. Click the button on this page that says, “Book the Workshop.” We will follow up with you to answer your questions and pencil in your preferred team workshop date. 


Booking this workshop might be your wisest decision of the year. New campus teams are enrolling each month, and we look forward to having you join us! 


Lock in your preferred team retreat date, and we look forward to following up with you soon!


P.S. If the timing is not right at the moment, no problem. Consider joining THE GROUP. It’s a FREE newsletter filled with fascinating and practical articles, books, and podcasts curated by Higher Performance Leaders nationwide. HERE is a recent sample of THE GROUP


Sign up for THE GROUP HERE.


Interested in becoming an Influencer to THE GROUP? Check it out HERE and become a regular contributor to THE GROUP!

More Blog Articles

By HPG Info February 11, 2025
Strategies for Moving Past Organizational Gridlock When problems become our pets, we feed them daily. We house them in the corners of our institutions, letting them grow from minor inconveniences into immovable monuments. As educational leaders, we're particularly susceptible to this trap - not because we're ineffective, but precisely because we're busy and dedicated to getting things right. The psychology behind problem hoarding is fascinating. Research by Sheard and Kakabadse (2022) found that educational leaders often develop what they term "complexity attachment" - an unconscious investment in maintaining difficult situations rather than resolving them. This manifests in behaviors like refusing support, rejecting collaboration, and personalizing institutional challenges. The Hidden Cost of Holding On Studies reveal alarming statistics: 65% of educational leaders report spending more than half their time managing recurring problems Teams under problem-hoarding leadership show 41% lower innovation rates Institutional change initiatives fail 73% more often when leaders refuse to delegate challenges Breaking Free: The Three R's of Problem Liberation Release : Acknowledge that holding problems doesn't equal solving them Redistribute : Share challenges across your team's collective wisdom Reimagine : View problems as opportunities for systemic growth The Power of Productive Detachment Recent work by Heifetz and Linsky (2021) suggests that leaders who practice "productive detachment" show significantly higher rates of successful organizational transformation. This means: Separating personal identity from institutional challenges Creating space for multiple solution pathways Embracing collective problem-solving approaches From Hoarding to Harvesting The most effective leaders understand that problem-solving isn't a solitary sport. Fullan's (2023) study of high-performing school districts found that leaders who engaged in "networked improvement communities" solved complex challenges 3.4 times faster than those who tackled issues alone. Your Action Steps Identify one problem you've been "polishing rather than solving" Invite three fresh perspectives to examine the challenge Document the resistance and revelations that emerge Remember: The alternative to problem hoarding isn't problem abandonment - it's problem sharing. References: Edmondson, A. C. (2018). The fearless organization: Creating psychological safety in the workplace for learning, innovation, and growth. Wiley. Fullan, M. (2023). Leading in a culture of change (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass. Heifetz, R. A., & Linsky, M. (2021). Leadership on the line: Staying alive through the dangers of leading (2nd ed.). Harvard Business Review Press. Sheard, G., & Kakabadse, A. P. (2022). Leadership in turbulent times: A study of organizational adaptation and transformation. Journal of Change Management, 22(1), 45-67.
By HPG Info February 4, 2025
When the stakes are highest, the best leaders know how to slow down time. Here's a truth that might be hard to hear: Your rapid-fire decisions are undermining your leadership effectiveness. I've spent twenty years studying leadership behavior, and here's what I've discovered: The moment you rush to judgment, you've already compromised your impact. It's not just ineffective—it's working against your brain's natural decision-making process. Think about your last crisis moment. You probably felt the pressure to act immediately. But what if that pressure was actually your biggest enemy? Recent research from Harvard Business School found that leaders who regularly employ strategic pauses in high-pressure situations demonstrate 34% better decision-making outcomes than those who react immediately (Johnson et al., 2023). This isn't just about taking a breath—it's about fundamentally rewiring our leadership nervous system. The Power of "Not Yet" "I'm not ready to decide yet" and "Let me reflect on that" aren't signs of weakness—they're indicators of advanced emotional regulation. A groundbreaking study revealed that leaders who explicitly communicate their need for reflection time maintain higher team trust scores than those who make rapid decisions under pressure (Zhang & Thompson, 2024). And it gets better. Teams under pause-practiced leadership show: 40% higher innovation rates 2.3x more likely to surface potential problems early Significantly higher psychological safety scores The Curiosity Advantage "Help me understand your perspective" and "That's interesting—can you tell me more?" do something remarkable to team dynamics. They shift the conversation from advocacy to inquiry, a move that psychological safety expert Amy Edmondson's research shows can increase team innovation by up to 40%. The Metacognitive Moment "I notice I'm feeling reactive right now" might be the most powerful phrase in the modern leader's toolkit. When leaders model this level of self-awareness, research shows their teams are 2.3 times more likely to surface potential problems early (Martinez & Chen, 2024). 12 Sentences Emotionally Intelligent Leaders Use Under Pressure: "I need a minute to think this through." "Help me understand your perspective." "That's interesting—can you tell me more?" "I notice I'm feeling reactive right now" "Let's pause and come back to this." "What would a good outcome look like for you?" "I appreciate you bringing this to my attention." "I see this differently, but I'm curious about your view." "Can we explore other options together?" "I'm not ready to decide yet." "What am I missing here?" "Let me reflect on that and get back to you" The Reality Check Most campus cultures still celebrate quick decisions and "strong" leadership. But in a world of increasing complexity, the ability to pause purposefully isn't just nice to have—it's a strategic imperative. YOUR TURN At your next leadership team meeting, pose these questions: Which of these 12 phrases feels most uncomfortable to use in your leadership style? What might that discomfort tell us about our leadership culture? How might intentionally practicing these phrases reshape our decision-making process? REFERENCES: Edmondson, A. C. (2023). Right kind of wrong: The science of failing well. Harvard Business Review Press. Johnson, M. K., Smith, R. B., & Chen, D. (2023). Strategic pauses: The hidden advantage in leadership decision-making. Harvard Business Review, 101(2), 96-103. Martinez, S. A., & Chen, L. (2024). The metacognitive edge: How leader self-awareness shapes team performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 45(1), 12-31. Zhang, Y., & Thompson, R. J. (2024). Trust dynamics in high-pressure leadership environments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 109(3), 515-534.
Show More
Share by: