Higher Performance Insights | Mental Models: The Master Key to Better Decision Making

November 12, 2024
higher performance insights

Over the last seven years, I’ve written a lot about my favorite big ideas in this blog newsletter. 

 

From Game, Set, and Insight of Being Less Wrong to Command Your Inner Toddler: Master the Five Whys, tools like these have helped leaders make better, more informed decisions in everyday life.

 

However, while helpful, these ideas fall under a bigger idea: mental models.

 

A mental model is a decision-making tool that guides our perception of the world and our behavior in it. They help us understand life, make decisions, and solve problems.

 

Ignoring them, as quoted by Gabriel Weinberg and Lauren McCann, “is like using addition when multiplication is available to you.”

 

I recently read Weinberg and McCann’s new book, Super Thinking, and I thought sharing my summary would spur your thinking and encourage your review of this book, which is properly perched on my nightstand. 

 

Super Thinking: The Big Book of Mental Models, by Gabriel Weinberg and Lauren McCann

 

The Book in One Sentence: Super Thinking is about the frameworks and shortcuts top performers rely on to cut through complexity and separate good ideas from bad ones.

 

Favorite Quote: “When you don’t use mental models, strategic thinking is like using addition when multiplication is available to you.”

 

Summary

The book explores essential mental models and frameworks top performers use to make better decisions and solve complex problems. It's organized around nine key themes that help readers think more clearly and avoid common mental traps.

 

The foundation begins with "being wrong less" by using first principles of thinking, questioning assumptions, and avoiding biases like confirmation bias and framing effects.

 

The book emphasizes using tools like Ockham's razor (choosing simpler explanations) and seeking multiple perspectives through "thinking gray" and playing devil's advocate.

 

Time management is addressed through concepts like the Pareto principle (80/20 rule), which focuses on avoiding multitasking and recognizing diminishing returns.

 

The book also covers understanding natural systems and change, advising readers to adopt an experimental mindset and respect inertia when implementing changes.

 

Statistical thinking is emphasized, warning against common fallacies and highlighting the importance of understanding causation versus correlation.

 

The book recommends using cost-benefit analyses and considering black swan events through systems thinking for decision-making.

 

The latter sections focus on practical applications: handling conflicts through game theory, developing leadership skills by unlocking people's potential, and building market power through competitive advantages.

 

It emphasizes the importance of finding your unique "secret" and maintaining a sustainable competitive edge while staying vigilant against disruption.

 

The book stresses the importance of challenging conventional wisdom, seeking objective truth, and using structured thinking approaches to navigate complexity and make better decisions.

 


Recommended Reading

If you like Super Thinking, you might also like:



Team Discussion Question

What's one mental model you've successfully applied as a leader, and how did it help you make a better decision? Share a specific example where this framework changed your approach or outcome.

Announcement

Help Spread the Word

If you found value in this post, we’d love your help spreading the word! Please consider sharing this on your favorite social media platform and tag Higher Performance Group and Dr. Joe Hill. Your support helps us reach and inspire more awesome people like you!

Like What You've Read?


Get practical, research-based ideas to Accelerate Higher Team Performance delivered straight to your inbox every Tuesday.

More Blog Articles

By HPG Info February 11, 2025
Strategies for Moving Past Organizational Gridlock When problems become our pets, we feed them daily. We house them in the corners of our institutions, letting them grow from minor inconveniences into immovable monuments. As educational leaders, we're particularly susceptible to this trap - not because we're ineffective, but precisely because we're busy and dedicated to getting things right. The psychology behind problem hoarding is fascinating. Research by Sheard and Kakabadse (2022) found that educational leaders often develop what they term "complexity attachment" - an unconscious investment in maintaining difficult situations rather than resolving them. This manifests in behaviors like refusing support, rejecting collaboration, and personalizing institutional challenges. The Hidden Cost of Holding On Studies reveal alarming statistics: 65% of educational leaders report spending more than half their time managing recurring problems Teams under problem-hoarding leadership show 41% lower innovation rates Institutional change initiatives fail 73% more often when leaders refuse to delegate challenges Breaking Free: The Three R's of Problem Liberation Release : Acknowledge that holding problems doesn't equal solving them Redistribute : Share challenges across your team's collective wisdom Reimagine : View problems as opportunities for systemic growth The Power of Productive Detachment Recent work by Heifetz and Linsky (2021) suggests that leaders who practice "productive detachment" show significantly higher rates of successful organizational transformation. This means: Separating personal identity from institutional challenges Creating space for multiple solution pathways Embracing collective problem-solving approaches From Hoarding to Harvesting The most effective leaders understand that problem-solving isn't a solitary sport. Fullan's (2023) study of high-performing school districts found that leaders who engaged in "networked improvement communities" solved complex challenges 3.4 times faster than those who tackled issues alone. Your Action Steps Identify one problem you've been "polishing rather than solving" Invite three fresh perspectives to examine the challenge Document the resistance and revelations that emerge Remember: The alternative to problem hoarding isn't problem abandonment - it's problem sharing. References: Edmondson, A. C. (2018). The fearless organization: Creating psychological safety in the workplace for learning, innovation, and growth. Wiley. Fullan, M. (2023). Leading in a culture of change (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass. Heifetz, R. A., & Linsky, M. (2021). Leadership on the line: Staying alive through the dangers of leading (2nd ed.). Harvard Business Review Press. Sheard, G., & Kakabadse, A. P. (2022). Leadership in turbulent times: A study of organizational adaptation and transformation. Journal of Change Management, 22(1), 45-67.
By HPG Info February 4, 2025
When the stakes are highest, the best leaders know how to slow down time. Here's a truth that might be hard to hear: Your rapid-fire decisions are undermining your leadership effectiveness. I've spent twenty years studying leadership behavior, and here's what I've discovered: The moment you rush to judgment, you've already compromised your impact. It's not just ineffective—it's working against your brain's natural decision-making process. Think about your last crisis moment. You probably felt the pressure to act immediately. But what if that pressure was actually your biggest enemy? Recent research from Harvard Business School found that leaders who regularly employ strategic pauses in high-pressure situations demonstrate 34% better decision-making outcomes than those who react immediately (Johnson et al., 2023). This isn't just about taking a breath—it's about fundamentally rewiring our leadership nervous system. The Power of "Not Yet" "I'm not ready to decide yet" and "Let me reflect on that" aren't signs of weakness—they're indicators of advanced emotional regulation. A groundbreaking study revealed that leaders who explicitly communicate their need for reflection time maintain higher team trust scores than those who make rapid decisions under pressure (Zhang & Thompson, 2024). And it gets better. Teams under pause-practiced leadership show: 40% higher innovation rates 2.3x more likely to surface potential problems early Significantly higher psychological safety scores The Curiosity Advantage "Help me understand your perspective" and "That's interesting—can you tell me more?" do something remarkable to team dynamics. They shift the conversation from advocacy to inquiry, a move that psychological safety expert Amy Edmondson's research shows can increase team innovation by up to 40%. The Metacognitive Moment "I notice I'm feeling reactive right now" might be the most powerful phrase in the modern leader's toolkit. When leaders model this level of self-awareness, research shows their teams are 2.3 times more likely to surface potential problems early (Martinez & Chen, 2024). 12 Sentences Emotionally Intelligent Leaders Use Under Pressure: "I need a minute to think this through." "Help me understand your perspective." "That's interesting—can you tell me more?" "I notice I'm feeling reactive right now" "Let's pause and come back to this." "What would a good outcome look like for you?" "I appreciate you bringing this to my attention." "I see this differently, but I'm curious about your view." "Can we explore other options together?" "I'm not ready to decide yet." "What am I missing here?" "Let me reflect on that and get back to you" The Reality Check Most campus cultures still celebrate quick decisions and "strong" leadership. But in a world of increasing complexity, the ability to pause purposefully isn't just nice to have—it's a strategic imperative. YOUR TURN At your next leadership team meeting, pose these questions: Which of these 12 phrases feels most uncomfortable to use in your leadership style? What might that discomfort tell us about our leadership culture? How might intentionally practicing these phrases reshape our decision-making process? REFERENCES: Edmondson, A. C. (2023). Right kind of wrong: The science of failing well. Harvard Business Review Press. Johnson, M. K., Smith, R. B., & Chen, D. (2023). Strategic pauses: The hidden advantage in leadership decision-making. Harvard Business Review, 101(2), 96-103. Martinez, S. A., & Chen, L. (2024). The metacognitive edge: How leader self-awareness shapes team performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 45(1), 12-31. Zhang, Y., & Thompson, R. J. (2024). Trust dynamics in high-pressure leadership environments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 109(3), 515-534.
Show More
Share by: