Higher Performance Insights | The Preemptionist Mindset

May 21, 2024
higher performance insights

In 2012, Expedia discovered that out of every 100 customers who booked travel through their platform, 58 subsequently contacted customer service for assistance. [1]


This trend posed a challenge to Expedia's foundational self-service principle, which was designed to enhance efficiency and reduce operational costs. However, the increased duration of customer service calls led to rising expenses. Notably, that year, Expedia recorded 20 million customer calls, each costing approximately $5, thereby amounting to a total expense of $100 million.

When Ryan O'Neill, Expedia's Head of Customer Experience, and Tucker Moodey, Executive Vice President of Global Customer Operations, investigated the reasons behind the high volume of customer calls, they discovered a concerning trend: the primary reason for these calls was that customers were requesting copies of their itineraries.


Like many self-service platforms, Expedia initially sent itineraries to customers via automated emails. However, many customers did not receive these emails, often due to mistyped email addresses or because they inadvertently deleted them, mistaking them for unsolicited marketing.


In response to this issue, Ryan O’Neill and Tucker Moodey convened a "war room" of top talent to implement a series of solutions. These ranged from revising the email delivery process to introducing an online tool that empowered customers to retrieve their itineraries independently.


Today, the previously recorded 20 million customer calls have drastically decreased, with the call rate plummeting from 58 percent in 2012 to approximately 15 percent to date.

 

This dramatic reduction is a textbook example of "upstream thinking," a proactive approach to problem-solving that focuses on preventing issues before they emerge. This method involves identifying potential problems early on and taking preventive actions rather than simply responding to issues as they occur. Such understanding highlights the value of preemptive strategies in problem-solving and process enhancement.

 

Of course, upstream interventions aren’t always possible. Problems can and will occur outside our trichotomy of control. But they offer a chance to improve the systems (or habits, if you prefer) that are contributing to, if not causing, the problem.


We don’t always have to fight fires. By deliberating and trying to be less wrong, we can prevent fires before they happen and reduce the harm they cause.

Team Discussion Question

How can your team integrate "upstream thinking" into each division or department of the organization to mitigate potential problems? Reflect on the specific challenges or recurring issues in your area and propose proactive measures to address them before they negatively affect performance or increase costs. Consider which systems or practices could be enhanced or implemented to promote a preventative approach in your daily operations.

[1] Thank you to Dan Heath for introducing me to Expedia’s story and the idea of upstream thinking in his book, Upstream: How to Solve Problems Before They Happen.

Announcement

Research suggests leadership teams perform at just 60% of their performance potential, leaving a massive 40% on the table. That discretionary effort becomes the make-or-break point for campuses nationwide. This is the dilemma between genuine campus engagement and the dragging lag of campus inertia.

 

My latest book, "CANCELAVERAGE: A Practical Guide to Accelerating Higher Team Performance," is a blueprint for this new standard. It's an invitation for leaders ready to lead with courage, challenge the status quo, and replace 'best practices' with something better.


If you're eager to move from busyness to brilliance, take advantage of the 2024 Graduation Special today!  BOOK A KEYNOTE now through 6/30/24, and you'll get 10 copies of the new #CancelAverage book!

 

Nearly half of the tour schedule has already been presold, so don’t wait! We want to accommodate your preferred dates.

 

Click the link, BOOK A KEYNOTE, to sharpen your team’s performance advantage today!

Help Spread the Word

If you found value in this post, we’d love your help spreading the word! Please consider sharing this on your favorite social media platform and tag Higher Performance Group and Dr. Joe Hill. Your support helps us reach and inspire more awesome people like you!

Like What You've Read?

Get practical, research-based ideas to Accelerate Higher Team Performance delivered straight to your inbox every Tuesday.

More Blog Articles

Higher Performance Insights | Breaking the Problem Hoarding Cycle

By HPG Info • February 11, 2025
Strategies for Moving Past Organizational Gridlock When problems become our pets, we feed them daily. We house them in the corners of our institutions, letting them grow from minor inconveniences into immovable monuments. As educational leaders, we're particularly susceptible to this trap - not because we're ineffective, but precisely because we're busy and dedicated to getting things right. The psychology behind problem hoarding is fascinating. Research by Sheard and Kakabadse (2022) found that educational leaders often develop what they term "complexity attachment" - an unconscious investment in maintaining difficult situations rather than resolving them. This manifests in behaviors like refusing support, rejecting collaboration, and personalizing institutional challenges. The Hidden Cost of Holding On Studies reveal alarming statistics: 65% of educational leaders report spending more than half their time managing recurring problems Teams under problem-hoarding leadership show 41% lower innovation rates Institutional change initiatives fail 73% more often when leaders refuse to delegate challenges Breaking Free: The Three R's of Problem Liberation Release : Acknowledge that holding problems doesn't equal solving them Redistribute : Share challenges across your team's collective wisdom Reimagine : View problems as opportunities for systemic growth The Power of Productive Detachment Recent work by Heifetz and Linsky (2021) suggests that leaders who practice "productive detachment" show significantly higher rates of successful organizational transformation. This means: Separating personal identity from institutional challenges Creating space for multiple solution pathways Embracing collective problem-solving approaches From Hoarding to Harvesting The most effective leaders understand that problem-solving isn't a solitary sport. Fullan's (2023) study of high-performing school districts found that leaders who engaged in "networked improvement communities" solved complex challenges 3.4 times faster than those who tackled issues alone. Your Action Steps Identify one problem you've been "polishing rather than solving" Invite three fresh perspectives to examine the challenge Document the resistance and revelations that emerge Remember: The alternative to problem hoarding isn't problem abandonment - it's problem sharing. References: Edmondson, A. C. (2018). The fearless organization: Creating psychological safety in the workplace for learning, innovation, and growth. Wiley. Fullan, M. (2023). Leading in a culture of change (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass. Heifetz, R. A., & Linsky, M. (2021). Leadership on the line: Staying alive through the dangers of leading (2nd ed.). Harvard Business Review Press. Sheard, G., & Kakabadse, A. P. (2022). Leadership in turbulent times: A study of organizational adaptation and transformation. Journal of Change Management, 22(1), 45-67.

Higher Performance Insights | The Art of Pause: Why Elite Leaders Master the Power of "Not Yet"

By HPG Info • February 4, 2025
When the stakes are highest, the best leaders know how to slow down time. Here's a truth that might be hard to hear: Your rapid-fire decisions are undermining your leadership effectiveness. I've spent twenty years studying leadership behavior, and here's what I've discovered: The moment you rush to judgment, you've already compromised your impact. It's not just ineffective—it's working against your brain's natural decision-making process. Think about your last crisis moment. You probably felt the pressure to act immediately. But what if that pressure was actually your biggest enemy? Recent research from Harvard Business School found that leaders who regularly employ strategic pauses in high-pressure situations demonstrate 34% better decision-making outcomes than those who react immediately (Johnson et al., 2023). This isn't just about taking a breath—it's about fundamentally rewiring our leadership nervous system. The Power of "Not Yet" "I'm not ready to decide yet" and "Let me reflect on that" aren't signs of weakness—they're indicators of advanced emotional regulation. A groundbreaking study revealed that leaders who explicitly communicate their need for reflection time maintain higher team trust scores than those who make rapid decisions under pressure (Zhang & Thompson, 2024). And it gets better. Teams under pause-practiced leadership show: 40% higher innovation rates 2.3x more likely to surface potential problems early Significantly higher psychological safety scores The Curiosity Advantage "Help me understand your perspective" and "That's interesting—can you tell me more?" do something remarkable to team dynamics. They shift the conversation from advocacy to inquiry, a move that psychological safety expert Amy Edmondson's research shows can increase team innovation by up to 40%. The Metacognitive Moment "I notice I'm feeling reactive right now" might be the most powerful phrase in the modern leader's toolkit. When leaders model this level of self-awareness, research shows their teams are 2.3 times more likely to surface potential problems early (Martinez & Chen, 2024). 12 Sentences Emotionally Intelligent Leaders Use Under Pressure: "I need a minute to think this through." "Help me understand your perspective." "That's interesting—can you tell me more?" "I notice I'm feeling reactive right now" "Let's pause and come back to this." "What would a good outcome look like for you?" "I appreciate you bringing this to my attention." "I see this differently, but I'm curious about your view." "Can we explore other options together?" "I'm not ready to decide yet." "What am I missing here?" "Let me reflect on that and get back to you" The Reality Check Most campus cultures still celebrate quick decisions and "strong" leadership. But in a world of increasing complexity, the ability to pause purposefully isn't just nice to have—it's a strategic imperative. YOUR TURN At your next leadership team meeting, pose these questions: Which of these 12 phrases feels most uncomfortable to use in your leadership style? What might that discomfort tell us about our leadership culture? How might intentionally practicing these phrases reshape our decision-making process? REFERENCES: Edmondson, A. C. (2023). Right kind of wrong: The science of failing well. Harvard Business Review Press. Johnson, M. K., Smith, R. B., & Chen, D. (2023). Strategic pauses: The hidden advantage in leadership decision-making. Harvard Business Review, 101(2), 96-103. Martinez, S. A., & Chen, L. (2024). The metacognitive edge: How leader self-awareness shapes team performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 45(1), 12-31. Zhang, Y., & Thompson, R. J. (2024). Trust dynamics in high-pressure leadership environments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 109(3), 515-534.
Show More
Share by: