Higher Performance Insights | Command Your Inner Toddler: Master the Five Whys

July 16, 2024
higher performance insights

When test scores drop, we're quick to blame the curriculum. It's easy, obvious, and lets us move on.


But what if the curriculum isn't the problem?


What if the real issue is hiding five layers deep?


That's where the Five Whys come in. It's a simple tool with profound implications for educational leaders: [1]


  1. Ask why.
  2. Then, ask why again.
  3. Keep going until you've asked why five times.

It's not magic. It's persistence.


Here's the thing: In education, we're surrounded by surface-level solutions. They're comfortable and quick, but they rarely solve the real problem.


  • The principal who implements a new reading program misses the underlying issue of teacher burnout.
  • The superintendent who blames low attendance overlooks systemic transportation challenges.
  • The district team that points to a lack of parent involvement ignores deeper community engagement issues.
  • The college president, who attributes declining enrollment to competition, fails to recognize shifting student needs and expectations.


We settle for the first answer because digging is hard, uncomfortable, and forces us to confront truths we'd rather ignore.


But here's the secret: The fifth why is where the magic happens. It's where real change begins. [2]


The Five Whys is a technique for determining the root cause of a problem by asking the question “Why” five times.


Real Example

Just keeping it real, last week, my early morning workout routine didn’t happen.


  • Why? – I was tired. (First why)
  • Why? – I went to bed late. (Second why)
  • Why? – I was on my phone. (Third why)
  • Why? – I was scrolling the social. (Fourth why)
  • Why? – I was bored. (Fifth why, a root cause)


The root cause was not tiredness, as first assumed, but boredom, which could be solved by (1) better meeting an unmet need (e.g., reading a book) or (2) making the behavior harder to do, as James Clear espouses in his book Atomic Habits. [3]


So, the next time you face a challenge, resist the urge to stop at the first why. Push further.


Ask again. And again.


Because the root cause is rarely where you expect it to be. And finding it? That's how you create Higher Performance and lasting change.

Team Discussion Question

Reflect on a recent challenge where your initial solution fell short. Apply the Five Whys technique as a team to uncover the root cause. How does this deeper insight change your perspective? What new, more effective strategies can you develop based on this analysis?

[1] Eric Ries introduced me to The Five Whys in his book, The Lean Startup: How Today’s Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses.

[2] In addition to The Five Whys, Toyota also developed the idea of Just In Case vs. Just In Time manufacturing, which I wrote about HERE

[3] Atomic Habits: An Easy & Proven Way to Build Good Habits & Break Bad Ones – James Clear.


Announcement

Research suggests leadership teams perform at just 60% of their performance potential, leaving a massive 40% on the table. That discretionary effort becomes the make-or-break point for campuses nationwide. This is the dilemma between genuine campus engagement and the dragging lag of campus inertia.

 

My latest book, CANCELAVERAGE: A Practical Guide to Accelerating Higher Team Performance, is a blueprint for this new standard. It's an invitation for leaders ready to lead with courage, challenge the status quo, and replace 'best practices' with something better.
 

Click the link, BOOK A KEYNOTE, to sharpen your team’s performance advantage today!

Help Spread the Word

If you found value in this post, we’d love your help spreading the word! Please consider sharing this on your favorite social media platform and tag Higher Performance Group and Dr. Joe Hill. Your support helps us reach and inspire more awesome people like you!

Like What You've Read?


Get practical, research-based ideas to Accelerate Higher Team Performance delivered straight to your inbox every Tuesday.

More Blog Articles

By HPG Info February 11, 2025
Strategies for Moving Past Organizational Gridlock When problems become our pets, we feed them daily. We house them in the corners of our institutions, letting them grow from minor inconveniences into immovable monuments. As educational leaders, we're particularly susceptible to this trap - not because we're ineffective, but precisely because we're busy and dedicated to getting things right. The psychology behind problem hoarding is fascinating. Research by Sheard and Kakabadse (2022) found that educational leaders often develop what they term "complexity attachment" - an unconscious investment in maintaining difficult situations rather than resolving them. This manifests in behaviors like refusing support, rejecting collaboration, and personalizing institutional challenges. The Hidden Cost of Holding On Studies reveal alarming statistics: 65% of educational leaders report spending more than half their time managing recurring problems Teams under problem-hoarding leadership show 41% lower innovation rates Institutional change initiatives fail 73% more often when leaders refuse to delegate challenges Breaking Free: The Three R's of Problem Liberation Release : Acknowledge that holding problems doesn't equal solving them Redistribute : Share challenges across your team's collective wisdom Reimagine : View problems as opportunities for systemic growth The Power of Productive Detachment Recent work by Heifetz and Linsky (2021) suggests that leaders who practice "productive detachment" show significantly higher rates of successful organizational transformation. This means: Separating personal identity from institutional challenges Creating space for multiple solution pathways Embracing collective problem-solving approaches From Hoarding to Harvesting The most effective leaders understand that problem-solving isn't a solitary sport. Fullan's (2023) study of high-performing school districts found that leaders who engaged in "networked improvement communities" solved complex challenges 3.4 times faster than those who tackled issues alone. Your Action Steps Identify one problem you've been "polishing rather than solving" Invite three fresh perspectives to examine the challenge Document the resistance and revelations that emerge Remember: The alternative to problem hoarding isn't problem abandonment - it's problem sharing. References: Edmondson, A. C. (2018). The fearless organization: Creating psychological safety in the workplace for learning, innovation, and growth. Wiley. Fullan, M. (2023). Leading in a culture of change (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass. Heifetz, R. A., & Linsky, M. (2021). Leadership on the line: Staying alive through the dangers of leading (2nd ed.). Harvard Business Review Press. Sheard, G., & Kakabadse, A. P. (2022). Leadership in turbulent times: A study of organizational adaptation and transformation. Journal of Change Management, 22(1), 45-67.
By HPG Info February 4, 2025
When the stakes are highest, the best leaders know how to slow down time. Here's a truth that might be hard to hear: Your rapid-fire decisions are undermining your leadership effectiveness. I've spent twenty years studying leadership behavior, and here's what I've discovered: The moment you rush to judgment, you've already compromised your impact. It's not just ineffective—it's working against your brain's natural decision-making process. Think about your last crisis moment. You probably felt the pressure to act immediately. But what if that pressure was actually your biggest enemy? Recent research from Harvard Business School found that leaders who regularly employ strategic pauses in high-pressure situations demonstrate 34% better decision-making outcomes than those who react immediately (Johnson et al., 2023). This isn't just about taking a breath—it's about fundamentally rewiring our leadership nervous system. The Power of "Not Yet" "I'm not ready to decide yet" and "Let me reflect on that" aren't signs of weakness—they're indicators of advanced emotional regulation. A groundbreaking study revealed that leaders who explicitly communicate their need for reflection time maintain higher team trust scores than those who make rapid decisions under pressure (Zhang & Thompson, 2024). And it gets better. Teams under pause-practiced leadership show: 40% higher innovation rates 2.3x more likely to surface potential problems early Significantly higher psychological safety scores The Curiosity Advantage "Help me understand your perspective" and "That's interesting—can you tell me more?" do something remarkable to team dynamics. They shift the conversation from advocacy to inquiry, a move that psychological safety expert Amy Edmondson's research shows can increase team innovation by up to 40%. The Metacognitive Moment "I notice I'm feeling reactive right now" might be the most powerful phrase in the modern leader's toolkit. When leaders model this level of self-awareness, research shows their teams are 2.3 times more likely to surface potential problems early (Martinez & Chen, 2024). 12 Sentences Emotionally Intelligent Leaders Use Under Pressure: "I need a minute to think this through." "Help me understand your perspective." "That's interesting—can you tell me more?" "I notice I'm feeling reactive right now" "Let's pause and come back to this." "What would a good outcome look like for you?" "I appreciate you bringing this to my attention." "I see this differently, but I'm curious about your view." "Can we explore other options together?" "I'm not ready to decide yet." "What am I missing here?" "Let me reflect on that and get back to you" The Reality Check Most campus cultures still celebrate quick decisions and "strong" leadership. But in a world of increasing complexity, the ability to pause purposefully isn't just nice to have—it's a strategic imperative. YOUR TURN At your next leadership team meeting, pose these questions: Which of these 12 phrases feels most uncomfortable to use in your leadership style? What might that discomfort tell us about our leadership culture? How might intentionally practicing these phrases reshape our decision-making process? REFERENCES: Edmondson, A. C. (2023). Right kind of wrong: The science of failing well. Harvard Business Review Press. Johnson, M. K., Smith, R. B., & Chen, D. (2023). Strategic pauses: The hidden advantage in leadership decision-making. Harvard Business Review, 101(2), 96-103. Martinez, S. A., & Chen, L. (2024). The metacognitive edge: How leader self-awareness shapes team performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 45(1), 12-31. Zhang, Y., & Thompson, R. J. (2024). Trust dynamics in high-pressure leadership environments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 109(3), 515-534.
Show More
Share by: