5 Signs You’re a Hyper-Control Leader

August 1, 2022

Hyper-Control leaders rarely take their organization as far as leaders who are skilled team builders.


Are YOU a Hyper-Control Leader? How would you know?


Cue the awkward tension, right?


If you’re even conscious to the question, good for you. 


Most leaders who need to ask themselves tough questions won’t. Which means your team might be answering the question instead. 


I get it. I’ve learned that I am predisposed to want to do most things by myself, which is never a good idea.

The good news is it’s a tendency you and I can fight and overcome.


Need some motivation?


Just know that your failure to grow a team will ultimately choke the life of your mission.


And with something like 85% of all campuses in declining enrollment, there’s a ton at stake.


The leader who wants to Hyper-Control everything is a leader who is a risk of losing their best talent.


It’s human nature for teams to feel a sense of belonging and ownership to the work. 


So, how do you know if you’re a Hyper-Control Leader? Here are 5 signs you are.


1. Nobody Does It As Well As You


Many Hyper-Control leaders honestly think they can do things better than their people. And when you’re starting out, sometimes that’s true.


Your campus isn’t exactly swimming in communication specialists, web developers, project managers, team leaders, and creative thinkers. Further, nobody should think as much about the mission and the future of your campus as you. 


Oh, and you don’t have a ton of budget to hire those things out.


So, you attempt to do many of these tasks yourself.


In the early stages of most initiatives, there are many hands-on modeling opportunities needed, indeed. 


You can’t just sit back and say, “all I do is cast vision,” when you have a campus draining enrollment and programs.


But inside this idea that you can do things better is a fatal flaw.


First, you’re only actually good at a few things. Own that. 


Unless it’s your principal gifting and the most important thing you can do to move the mission forward, you may want to consider giving key tasks away to those who own different gifts than you. 


Second, even if you have people who are almost as good as you are in an area, a good rule of thumb is to farm out that responsibility quickly.


Why? Because they’ll get better. 


And, because you need to have the capacity to focus on becoming more brilliant than busy. 


Leaders who desire to become world-class, spend time developing their primary gifts. They learn to delegate very, very well. 


After nearly three decades in leadership, I’ve realized I’m only wickedly good at a few things: 


✅  Coaching Potential

✅  Team Building/Collaboration

✅  Strategic Ideation


I can assess talent quickly, pull people together around ideas and content, and align new strategies to win. 


Everything else falls off a steep cliff quickly.


When I bring those gifts in service to any campus team, I help move their success forward. When I try to do anything else, it’s almost always an average performance (at best)6.


You’re no different.


So, what are you great at? Develop that and let so much of the other stuff go.


2. You Feel “The Guilties” Letting Go


“Great theory, Joe,” you say. But I feel guilty letting go and giving any important work to other people.


Really?


Why?


Maybe you need some time in reflection to get to the root of that.


Listen, it’s not a unique problem. Many leaders feel guilty about giving assignments, tasks, and whole areas of responsibility to other people. But if that’s you, you really need to drill down on why that is.


Essentially your unwillingness to let go assumes you have been favored with all the best gifts, and no one else is gifted.


That’s pride. 


And it means that you will refuse to let other people explore and develop their God-given gifts.


Why would you feel guilty about letting people lean into their gifting?


Own that.


RECLAIM MOMENTUM 

Learn how to drive high community trust and higher team performance via our 2-Hour {Live} keynote delivered on your campus to your team(s).

Learn More

3. You Are Threatened By Gifted People


Let’s be honest. Deep down, you and I can feel threatened by gifted people.


What’s underneath that emotion? 


Insecurity. 


And unchecked, insecurity permanently stunts your growth and the growth of your organization.


Insecurity is unattractive. If you really go there, you’ll find fear, jealousy, anxiety, and all kinds of nasty things brewing under that self-doubt. 


So how do you battle your insecurity? By doing the opposite of what you feel like doing.


Welcome the gifts of other people. 

➜ Give them responsibility. 

➜ Celebrate people who are more gifted that you. 

➜ Trust.


You’ll discover everyone becomes better, including you.


4. You Fear Others Will Fail 


You say, “But what happens when I give important tasks to gifted people, and they mess up or take things in the wrong direction?” “That’s why I need to stay in control.”


Nope. That will get you right back to stunting the growth of your team and mission.


The fear you have of delegating and having people head off in the wrong direction is much easier to solve than you might think.

These are issues of clarity.


Teams align around clarity. Having a clear mission, clear strategies, standards, and clear values, clearly articulated means you can deploy many leaders and never have them run things off the rails.


In the absence of clarity, you will default to control because you worry that leaders will take your system to places you don’t believe it should go. 


And the truth is, they might. Not because they’re underperformers, but because you haven’t been clear with them.


So, if you want to release and leverage your most talented leaders, your job is to state the mission, vision, and strategy clearly enough that it’s simple, scalable, and sustainable for everyone. 


In the absence of clarity, well-intentioned team members end up going rogue, not because they’re trying to be disloyal, but because you never clearly defined the destination.


The more clarity you have as a leader, the less you will feel the need to be a Hyper-Control leader.


5. You’re Chronically Overwhelmed


The final reason you’ll want to stay a Hyper-Control leader is that you’re so overwhelmed you feel like you can’t change anything. In fact, you might feel that you can barely finish reading this blog article.


Hyper-Control leaders always feel overwhelmed because the mission of your campus should always outsize the capacity of an individual… Including you.


Guess what? That will never go away unless you transform. It’s a mindset thing. 


The best way to crush this interference is to start empowering (not overpowering or disempowering) others.


You will stay overwhelmed when you Hyper-Control and your mission will never grow or move forward.


On the better side of this, you may feel overwhelmed for a while because you’re opening up and beginning to empower others.


That’s an entirely different kind of overwhelm - and one that will eventually go away as you find your sweet spot and your team performance grows.


So, the choice is yours: 


➜ The permanent kind that stays because you’ll never delegate anything.


➜ The temporary kind that eventually becomes habituated across your system, and YOU find RELIEF. 


Your call!


Stop the Gravitational Pull of Average Attitudes and Average Performance


I know how much the leadership grind has on the overall health of yourself and your team and I trust that your calendar shows evidence of a few intermittent “recharge” breaks.


But don’t be fooled. 


I’m here to remind you that unless your campus culture brings you more life than it sucks out of you, there are not enough vacation days in your contract to keep you healthy and vibrant. 


Think of what you and your team have endured. 


Leaders hate when I say this (while they shake their heads in agreement), but managing crisis was challenging but leading OUT of crisis will be much more complex and demanding. 


Healthy leaders and teams will be in high demand to build (not rebuild) the plans and strategies to navigate the unchartered territory ahead. 


You need to act and Reclaim Your Momentum!


I’m going on tour to help you get it back. 


I’ve turned this essential topic into a 2-hour LIVE keynote that I’m delivering to campus leadership teams across the county over the next two months. 


If you’re like most campus leaders, you’ve spent countless hours these past years putting out fires, dealing with negativity, drama, and just plain old burnout across the board. 


And, like so many others, you’re fed up with feeling stuck. 


It’s time to take action.

Learn About This 2-Hour LIVE Keynote

What are you waiting for?

It would be an honor to be your guide and help you and your team regain lost ground and Reclaim Your Momentum. 

More Blog Articles

By HPG Info April 1, 2025
The Antifragile Navigating Between Government's New Policy and Enduring Campus Purpose In today's volatile educational landscape, mere survival is insufficient. Fragile institutions will shatter under pressure, resilient ones may endure but remain unchanged, while truly antifragile campus leadership thrives amidst disruption. As federal directives radically reshape the educational terrain, the most effective leaders recognize that this moment demands more than defensive posturing or passive resilience—it requires transformative adaptation that converts challenge into advantage. The best campus leaders make difficult choices: they plug their noses through uncomfortable transitions, check their gut instincts when cherished programs face scrutiny, and decisively shift from the back foot of defensiveness to the front foot of progress and performance. They understand that reaction without reflection risks compromising institutional integrity, while calculated, purpose-driven responses can position their institutions to emerge stronger than before. This antifragile approach—where institutions actually gain strength from disorder—represents the only viable path forward in a landscape where traditional resilience merely maintains the status quo. Leaders who recognize this fundamental truth are positioned to transform their institutions rather than merely preserve them. Here are four crucial pivots campus leaders must make to navigate these turbulent waters: Pivot 1: From Labeled Initiatives to Embedded Values New Policy Challenge : Government directives are targeting specific language and programs labeled as diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives. Funding cuts threaten institutions that maintain such explicitly labeled programs. Required Pivot : Rather than merely renaming programs or stripping websites of certain terminology, visionary campus leaders have been embedding these values directly into operational frameworks for years. "We admit every qualified student," explains one university president. "The second we decided to admit every qualified student and adjust with that and grow with that, our student body became completely representative of all family backgrounds and socioeconomic levels." This merit-based, egalitarian approach transcends political flashpoints. It doesn't require special goals or committees—just clear admissions standards, accessible pathways to qualification, and systems supporting student success regardless of background. The pivot requires moving from symbolic statements to structural systems that naturally produce representative outcomes. Pivot 2: From Hidden Impact to Visible Value New Policy Challenge : Research grants and innovative projects are being canceled based on surface-level assessments rather than substantive evaluation. As one campus leader notes, "The reasons they're giving for elimination of these grants are almost always wrong. They don't have the information down to the grant level." Required Pivot : Campus leaders must make the "invisible hand" of their innovation visible to all stakeholders. This invisible hand operates largely unseen by the public yet powers technological breakthroughs we take for granted. As one leader describes it, academic science "underpins all of the technological breakthroughs" we use daily. Tesla vehicles are "based on thousands of academic inventions and discoveries." Your iPhone? A product of "literally hundreds of thousands of academic articles, academic research, all of which is invisible." Campus innovation extends far beyond technology. Health initiatives, environmental solutions, and social programs emerging from campus labs and classrooms solve complex problems facing communities nationwide. When these projects face funding cuts, we lose not just immediate benefits but long-term societal advancement. Research by Valero and Van Reenen (2019) found that increases in university research significantly drive economic growth within regions, with spillover effects extending up to 100 miles from campus locations. Additionally, Moretti's (2021) work shows that campus innovation hubs create five additional local jobs for every direct innovation position. The pivot requires systematically documenting and communicating these impacts—"leaving for the record," as one leader puts it, exactly what each project accomplishes and why it matters to national interests. Pivot 3: From Reactive Defense to Proactive Service New Policy Challenge : New administrations naturally set new priorities, expecting campus institutions to rapidly align with these shifts or face defunding. Required Pivot : Instead of defensively protecting the status quo, forward-thinking leaders are "regrouping to be of service to the new trajectories." This means asking fundamental questions: How can our campus better serve national priorities while maintaining our core mission? How might we reframe our essential work to demonstrate alignment with new directions held within the dynamic of our community's greatest values? The pivot requires recognizing that campus institutions are a national asset of unbelievable value to the country and its ultimate success. There's no way to [reach national goals] without robust, in-demand, and profitable colleges and universities. The challenge is communicating this essential role in terms that resonate with current policy priorities. Pivot 4: From Political Positioning to Purpose Affirmation New Policy Challenge : Polarized political rhetoric pressures campus leaders to choose sides, risking either alienation from government funding sources or compromise of institutional values. Required Pivot : The most successful campus leaders are rising above political divisions by recommitting to their foundational purpose. "What we need to do," explains one community college president, "is we need to say to the national government, here we are, this is what we do. Yes, we understand that you're concerned about this and this and this, but you can't throw the baby out with the bathwater here." As Block (2018) notes in his research on campus transformation, "Leadership in times of change requires both adaptation to external forces and unwavering commitment to institutional purpose" (p. 87). This pivot requires articulating an institutional mission that transcends political moment while showing genuine responsiveness to legitimate policy concerns. It means distinguishing between superficial language changes and substantive operational compromises. The most successful campus leaders of tomorrow won't be those who perfectly preserved yesterday's systems. They'll be the ones who seized today's disruption as fuel for tomorrow's transformation, who recognized that in education's most challenging moment lies its greatest opportunity for meaningful evolution. In the end, antifragility isn't just about weathering the storm—it's about learning to dance in life's sh%$ storms. YOUR TURN Beyond labeled programs, what structural systems ensure your campus naturally produces inclusive outcomes? How effectively are you documenting and communicating your "invisible hand" of innovation to policymakers? In what specific ways can your institution better serve emerging national priorities while maintaining core values? How might you articulate your campus purpose in language that resonates across political divides? References Block, P. (2018). Community: The structure of belonging in campus environments. Berrett-Koehler Publishers. Moretti, E. (2021). The new geography of jobs and innovation. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. Valero, A., & Van Reenen, J. (2019). The economic impact of universities: Evidence from across the globe. Economics of Education Review, 68, 53-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2018.09.001
By HPG Info March 25, 2025
Why Sacrificing Team Health During Budget Crunch is the Most Expensive Mistake in Education When budgets shrink, what's the first thing to go? Usually, it's team development. The workshops. The retreats. The "soft skills" training, right? That's not just a mistake—it's fiscal malpractice. The math doesn't add up Dysfunctional leadership teams waste 20-40% of available resources (Edmondson & Lei, 2014)1. During constrained times, that's not just inefficient—it's existentially threatening. The instinct to cut team development during budget crunches is understandable but backward. It's like deciding to save money by skipping oil changes. It feels like savings until the engine seizes. Team Communication: The Foundation that Prevents Waste Teams with clear, consistent communication make budget reductions that are 31% less likely to require costly corrections later (Pentland, 2012)2. Without it? Information silos form. Decisions get reversed. Resources evaporate fixing preventable mistakes. Strong team communication isn't a nicety—it's how you prevent expensive false starts during times when you can least afford them. Team Connection: The Retention Superpower Teams with strong interpersonal bonds retain 42% more key talent during downsizing periods (Gallup, 2022)3. Every senior position lost costs $276,000 to replace (SHRM, 2023)4. Team connection isn't just about feeling good—it's your most powerful retention strategy when your best people have the most reasons to leave. Team Alignment: The Protection of Core Mission When budgets shrink, misaligned teams protect territories and special projects. Aligned teams protect missions and outcomes. Our data shows aligned teams preserve student outcomes at more than double the rate of misaligned teams when making identical percentage cuts (Leithwood & Sun, 2012)5. Alignment isn't abstract—it's how you ensure cuts happen where they'll do the least damage to what matters most. Team Capacity: The Antidote to Doing More with Less Budget cuts inevitably redistribute workloads. Teams with high capacity scores handle this redistribution without breaking. Low-capacity teams see a 34% increase in stress-related leave during contraction periods—creating a costly spiral of more work for fewer people (Bakker & Demerouti, 2017)6. Capacity building isn't optional—it's how you prevent the collapse that comes when fewer people must shoulder more responsibility. Team Execution: The Implementation Insurance Policy When resources are limited, execution failures become exponentially costlier. High-execution teams implement budget reductions with 28% fewer disruptions to core operations and 47% fewer compliance issues (Honig & Hatch, 2014)7. Execution strength isn't a bonus—it's the difference between cuts that succeed and cuts that create cascading new problems. The Unignorable Numbers Teams with strong health metrics implement budget reductions: 11 months faster (Robinson et al., 2019)8 With 22% less staff turnover (Kraft et al., 2020)9 While protecting student outcomes (Fullan, 2021)10 That's not soft—that's hard numbers. The Smallest Possible Action Before you cut another program or position, assess your team's health across the five essential dimensions: Communication: How clearly does information flow? Connection: How strong are interpersonal bonds? Alignment: How unified is your focus on mission? Capacity: How prepared are people to absorb change? Execution: How reliably do you implement decisions? The gap between where you are and where you could be is likely larger than any line item in your budget. The Choice You can invest in team health now or pay significantly more in wasted resources later. During times of constraint, team health isn't a luxury. It's the only fiscally responsible choice. Want to assess where your team stands? info@higherperformancegroup.com for a complimentary Team Health Assessment from Higher Performance Group, helping campus leaders turn budget challenges into opportunities for mission-focused transformation. References Footnotes Edmondson, A. C., & Lei, Z. (2014). Psychological safety: The history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 23-43. Pentland, A. (2012). The new science of building great teams. Harvard Business Review, 90(4), 60-69. Gallup. (2022). State of the Global Workplace Report. Gallup Press. Society for Human Resource Management. (2023). SHRM Talent Acquisition Benchmark Report. Leithwood, K., & Sun, J. (2012). The nature and effects of transformational school leadership: A meta-analytic review of unpublished research. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(3), 387-423. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273-285. Honig, M. I., & Hatch, T. C. (2014). Crafting coherence: How schools strategically manage multiple, external demands. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 16-30. Robinson, V. M., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2019). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635-674. Kraft, M. A., Marinell, W. H., & Shen-Wei Yee, D. (2020). School organizational contexts, teacher turnover, and student achievement: Evidence from panel data. American Educational Research Journal, 53(5), 1411-1449. Fullan, M. (2021). The right drivers for whole system success. Center for Strategic Education.
Show More
Share by: